The world was not supportive. They look at me as a joke for 13 to 14 years until I could prove feasibility; then I had competitors. Those that laughed at me became my competitors.
Ada YonathRead
I don't walk into the lab in the morning thinking, 'I am a woman, and I will carry out an experiment that will conquer the world.' I am a scientist, not male or female. A scientist.
Interpretation
The quote emphasizes that one's gender should not define their professional identity or capabilities.
Ada Yonath highlights the importance of focusing on one's professional role rather than being categorized by gender. She expresses that her identity as a scientist transcends the labels of male or female, advocating for the recognition of merit and expertise in the scientific community without the constraints of gender biases.
In practice
In a conference discussing gender representation in STEM fields.
The world was not supportive. They look at me as a joke for 13 to 14 years until I could prove feasibility; then I had competitors. Those that laughed at me became my competitors.
My neighborhood didn't really encourage women, though it didn't prevent women from progressing, either.
Talk to people... everything good I've done has come from conversations with people. Science is a very social phenomenon.
We are in a fool's climate, accidentally kept cool by smoke, and before this century is over billions of us will die and the few breeding pairs of people that survive will be in the Arctic where the climate remains tolerable.
Transitional forms are generally lacking at the species level, but they are abundant between larger groups.
In the long run, curiosity-driven research just works better... Real breakthroughs come from people focusing on what they're excited about.
Our minds work in real time, which begins at the Big Bang and will end, if there is a Big Crunch - which seems unlikely, now, from the latest data showing accelerating expansion. Consciousness would come to an end at a singularity.
The very large brain that humans have, plus the things that go along with it - language, art, science - seemed to have evolved only once. The eye, by contrast, independently evolved 40 times. So, if you were to 'replay' evolution, the eye would almost certainly appear again, whereas the big brain probably wouldn't.
Subscribe for the occasional hand-picked quote. No noise.