Any time you get two people in a room who disagree about anything, the time of day, there is a scene to be written. That's what I look for.
Aaron SorkinRead
When I wrote 'The West Wing,' the juice behind it was that in popular culture, our leaders in government are generally portrayed as Machiavellian, or as idiots. I thought, well, how about writing about a group of hyper-competent people?
Interpretation
This quote reflects the desire to depict leaders as capable and competent rather than corrupt or incompetent.
Aaron Sorkin expresses a motivation to challenge the negative stereotypes commonly associated with government leaders in popular culture. By envisioning a narrative focused on 'hyper-competent' individuals, he advocates for a more nuanced and positive portrayal of those in power, suggesting that effective leadership can exist in reality and should be represented in media.
In practice
In a discussion about political series, one might quote Sorkin to highlight how media shapes perceptions of leadership.
Any time you get two people in a room who disagree about anything, the time of day, there is a scene to be written. That's what I look for.
The upside of web-based journalism is that everybody gets a chance. The downside is that everybody gets a chance.
I'll get cast occasionally as sort of the jerk version of myself, and I have fun doing that. But it's really better for everyone if I stay behind the camera.
Decisions are made by those who show up. Don't ever forget that you're a citizen of this world.
Good writers borrow from other writers. Great writers steal from them outright.
With 'The Social Network,' I got into it at first because frankly I thought there was a cool courtroom drama to be had with the intellectual properties. And then what further drew me in was that the most extraordinary social networking device ever created was created by the world's most antisocial person. I liked that story.
That a peasant may become king does not render the kingdom democratic.
We must be the great arsenal of Democracy.
The future of this republic is in the hands of the American voter.
Religious factions will go on imposing their will on others unless the decent people connected to them recognize that religion has no place in public policy. They must learn to make their views known without trying to make their views the only alternatives.
Those that deem politics beneath their dignity are doomed to be governed by those of lesser talents.
There may be circumstances in which damaging our relationship with countries over human rights is counterproductive and the benefits to human rights may be very small because of our limited capacity to enforce our stance. That was the dilemma the United States faced after Tiananmen Square.
Subscribe for the occasional hand-picked quote. No noise.