The power of the Web is in its universality. Access by everyone regardless of disability is an essential aspect.
Tim Berners-LeeRead
What's very important from my point of view is that there is one web β¦ Anyone that tries to chop it into two will find that their piece looks very boring.
Interpretation
The internet should remain a unified platform to avoid fragments that lack interest and value.
Tim Berners-Lee emphasizes the importance of maintaining a single, cohesive web. He warns that attempts to divide the internet into separate parts would lead to a loss of value and appeal, resulting in a fragmented experience that lacks the richness and diversity that the interconnected web provides.
In practice
During a tech conference, when discussing the future of the internet.
The power of the Web is in its universality. Access by everyone regardless of disability is an essential aspect.
[The internet] ought to be like clay, rather than a sculpture that you observe from a distance.
The people who designed the tools that make the Net run had their own ideas for the future.
Technology innovation is starting to explode and having open-source material out there really helps this explosion. You get students and researchers involved and you get people coming through and building start ups based on open source products.
One way to think about the magnitude of the changes to come is to think about how you went about your business before powerful Web search engines. You probably wouldn't have imagined that a world of answers would be available to you in under a second. The next set of advances will have an different effect, but similar in magnitude.
Software companies should take more responsibility for security holes, especially in browsers and e-mail clients. There are some straightforward things the industry should be doing right now to fix things, and I don't know why they haven't been done yet.
People have a right to privacy, but they also have a right to live. Fundamentally, we need cybersecurity and need to secure communications as well.
As we put autonomous cars on the road, connect Alexas to our lights and our thermostats, put ill-protected Internet-connected video cameras on our houses, and conduct our financial lives over our cell phones, our vulnerabilities expand exponentially.
I have no problem with technological solutions to social problems. The key question for me is, 'Who gets to implement them?' and, 'What kinds of politics of reform do technological solutions smuggle through the back door?'
Sharing the code just seems like The Right Thing to Do. It costs us rather little, but it benefits a lot of people in sometimes very significant ways. There are many university research projects, proof of concept publisher demos, and new platform test beds that have leveraged the code. Free software that people value adds wealth to the world.
Technological society leads to increasing numbers of people who cannot adapt to the inhuman rhythm of modern life with its emphasis on specialization. A class of people is growing up who are unexploitable because they are not worth employing even for the minimum wage. Technological progress makes whole categories of people useless without making it possible to support them with the wealth produced by the progress.
The fundamental problem with program maintenance is that fixing a defect has a substantial chance of introducing another.
Subscribe for the occasional hand-picked quote. No noise.