There is no controversy within science over the core proposition of evolutionary theory.
Kenneth R. MillerRead
Whether conservative or liberal, fundamentalist or agnostic, the more students learn of biology, the more they accept evolution.
Interpretation
The quote emphasizes that knowledge in biology leads to a greater acceptance of the theory of evolution, regardless of one's beliefs.
Kenneth R. Miller suggests that regardless of a person's ideological stance—be it conservative, liberal, religious, or secular—gaining knowledge in biology tends to foster a greater acceptance of the concept of evolution. This reflects the overarching idea that education and understanding often bridge gaps in belief and promote scientific literacy.
In practice
In a classroom discussion about the relevance of evolution in today's science curriculum.
There is no controversy within science over the core proposition of evolutionary theory.
We humans have a tendency to see ourselves as completely different from other animals, and the way in which large segments of the public continue to reject the theory of evolution is just one symptom of that malaise.
For much of history it was possible to believe that the great diversity of life on Earth was a fixed creation, that the living world had never changed. But when the first stirrings of industry demanded that fuel be dug from the earth and hillsides be leveled for roads and railways, the Earth's true past was dug up in abundance.
Evolution isn't just a story about where we came from. It's an epic at the center of life itself. Far from robbing our lives of meaning, it instills an appreciation for the beautiful, enduring, and ultimately triumphant fabric of life that covers our planet. Understanding that doesn't demean human life - it enhances it.
When we benefit from CT scanners, M.R.I. devices, pacemakers and arterial stents, we can immediately appreciate how science affects the quality of our lives.
It appears that anything you say about the way that theory and experiment may interact is likely to be correct, and anything you say about the way that theory and experiment must interact is likely to be wrong.
Some of the hydrogen in your body comes from the Big Bang, and when you see a kid walking down the street with a helium balloon, you can say, 'There goes some of the primordial universe.'
If Mars formed life, then life on Earth could have been seeded by life on Mars, making every life form on Earth descended from Martians.
Any work of science, no matter what its point of departure, cannot become fully convincing until it crosses the boundary between the theoretical and the experimental: Experimentation must give way to argument, and argument must have recourse to experimentation.
In the last analysis the entire field of psychology may reduce to biological electrochemistry.
Subscribe for the occasional hand-picked quote. No noise.