A wonderful area for speculative academic work is the unknowable. These days religious subjects are in disfavor, but there are still plenty of good topics. The nature of consciousness, the workings of the brain, the origin of aggression, the origin of language, the origin of life on earth, SETI and life on other worlds...this is all great stuff. Wonderful stuff. You can argue it interminably. But it can't be contradicted, because nobody knows the answer to any of these topics.
Interpretation
The quote highlights the fascinating and open-ended nature of speculative academic work in areas that are not yet fully understood.
Michael Crichton emphasizes the allure of exploring topics that remain mysterious and unknown to humanity, such as consciousness, language, and the potential for extraterrestrial life. He suggests that while some subjects are neglected, they still offer rich opportunities for discussion and intellectual exploration since definitive answers are elusive, thus encouraging ongoing inquiry and debate.
In practice
In a university lecture discussing the philosophy of science, this quote could frame an argument about the nature of academic inquiry.
In other centuries, human beings wanted to be saved, or improved, or freed, or educated. But in our century, they want to be entertained. The great fear is not of disease or death, but of boredom. A sense of time on our hands, a sense of nothing to do. A sense that we are not amused.
Let's be clear. The planet is not in jeopardy. We are in jeopardy. We haven't got the power to destroy the planet - or to save it. But we might have the power to save ourselves.
Scientific research was much like prospecting: you went out and you hunted, armed with your maps and instruments, but in the ened your preparations did not matter, or even your intuition. You needed your luck, and whatever benefits accrued to the diligent, through sheer, grinding hard work.
Living systems are never in equilibrium. They are inherently unstable. They may seem stable, but they’re not. Everything is moving and changing. In a sense, everything is on the edge of collapse.
The characteristic human trait is not awareness but conformity, and the characteristic result is religious warfare. Other animals fight for territory or food; but, uniquely in the animal kingdom, human beings fight for their 'beliefs.'
Do you know what we call opinion in the absence of evidence? We call it prejudice.
I believe all complicated phenomena can be explained by simpler scientific principles.
Mathematics deals exclusively with the relations of concepts to each other without consideration of their relation to experience.
I have seen firsthand that agricultural science has enormous potential to increase the yields of small farmers and lift them out of hunger and poverty.
What do you think science is? There is nothing magical about science. It is simply a systematic way for carefully and thoroughly observing nature and using consistent logic to evaluate results. So which part of that exactly do you disagree with? Do you disagree with being thorough? Using careful observation? Being systematic? Or using consistent logic?
For me, science is already fantastical enough. Unlocking the secrets of nature with fundamental physics or cosmology or astrobiology leads you into a wonderland compared with which beliefs in things like alien abductions pale into insignificance.
Name the greatest of all inventors. Accident.
Subscribe for the occasional hand-picked quote. No noise.