Now, if anything at all can be known to be wrong, it seems to me to be unshakably certain that it would be wrong to make any sentient being suffer eternally for any offence whatever.
Antony FlewRead
What would have to occur or to have occurred to constitute for you a disproof of the love of, or the existence of, God?
Interpretation
This quote challenges one to consider what evidence would negate their belief in God or love.
Antony Flew's quote invites reflection on the nature of belief, particularly in God and love, by posing a thought-provoking question about what types of events or evidence would lead one to doubt these profound concepts. It emphasizes the idea that belief is often steadfast, yet it can be critically examined through the lens of skepticism and rational inquiry.
In practice
In a philosophical debate about faith and evidence.
Now, if anything at all can be known to be wrong, it seems to me to be unshakably certain that it would be wrong to make any sentient being suffer eternally for any offence whatever.
Although I was once sharply critical of the argument to design, I have since come to see that, when correctly formatted, this argument constitutes a persuasive case for the existence of God.
We had a big controversy in the United States when there was a limited number of dialysis machines. In Seattle, they appointed what they called a 'God committee' to choose who should get it, and that committee was eventually abandoned. Society ended up paying the whole bill for dialysis instead of having people make those decisions.
Man is an intelligence in servitude to his organs.
The empire of Christ the King includes not only Catholic nations, not only baptized persons who, though of right belonging to the Church, have been led astray by error, or have been cut off from her by schism, but also all those who are outside the Christian faith: so that truly the whole of mankind is subject to the power of Jesus Christ.
Our job as humans is to make admiration of others and adoration of God fully conscious and deliberate.
[E]very Man who comes among us, and takes up a piece of Land, becomes a Citizen, and by our Constitution has a Voice in Elections, and a share in the Government of the Country.
Is not the brand of 'double-dealer' stamped on the forehead of every democratic slaveholder? Are not fraud and hypocrisy the religion of the man who calls himself a democrat, and hold his fellow-man in bondage?
Subscribe for the occasional hand-picked quote. No noise.