Would they not fear that citizens not less tenacious than conscious of their rights would flock from the remotest extremes of their respective states to the places of election, to overthrow their tyrants, and to substitute men who would be disposed to avenge the violated majesty of the people?
Interpretation
This quote suggests that citizens who are aware of their rights will unite to challenge tyrants and demand justice.
In this quote, Alexander Hamilton emphasizes the power of an informed and rights-conscious citizenry. He warns that individuals who are both aware of their rights and determined to protect them may rise against oppressive rulers, seeking to replace them with leaders who will uphold the dignity and authority of the people. This reflects the foundational principle of democracy, where the voice of the citizens can counteract tyranny.
In practice
This quote can be used in a speech about civic responsibility and the importance of voting.
When men, engaged in unjustifiable pursuits, are aware that obstructions may come from a quarter which bare apprehension of opposition from doing what they would with eagerness rush into if no such external impediments were to be feared.
The tendency of a national bank is to increase public and private credit. The former gives power to the state, for the protection of its rights and interests: and the latter facilitates and extends the operations of commerce among individuals. Industry is increased, commodities are multiplied, agriculture and manufacturers flourish: and herein consists the true wealth and prosperity of a state.
It's not tyranny we desire; it's a just, limited, federal government.
The Achaeans soon experienced, as often happens, that a victorious and powerful ally is but another name for a master.
The people are turbulent and changing; they seldom judge right or make good decision.
The true principle of a republic is that the people should choose whom they please to govern them. Representation is imperfect, in proportion as the current of popular favor is checked. The great source of free government, popular election, should be perfectly pure, and the most unbounded liberty allowed.
You just don't, in the 21st century, behave in 19th-century fashion by invading another country on completely trumped up pre-text.
(A Foreign Secretary) is forever poised between the cliche and the indiscretion.
Hezbollah-controlled Lebanon now presides over the UN Security Council. This means, in effect, that a terror organization presides over the body entrusted with guaranteeing the world's security. You couldn't make this thing up.
Everything would be alright if everything was put back in the hands of the people, and we're going to have to put it back in the hands of the people.
If there's another 9/11 or a major war in the Middle-East involving a U.S. attack on Iran, I have no doubt that there will be, the day after or within days an equivalent of a Reichstag fire decree that will involve massive detentions in this country.
When it comes to preventing Iran from obtaining a nuclear weapon, I will take no options off the table. ... That includes all elements of American power: a political effort aimed at isolating Iran, a diplomatic effort to sustain our coalition and ensure that the Iranian program is monitored, an economic effort that imposes crippling sanctions and, yes, a military effort to be prepared for any contingency.
Subscribe for the occasional hand-picked quote. No noise.