Philosophers have not kept up with modern developments in science. Particularly physics.
Stephen HawkingRead
Topic
228 quotes
Philosophers have not kept up with modern developments in science. Particularly physics.
Now, learning how to make a movie is something you can figure out in about an afternoon. The physics of it, the marks, the lights, etc. What's hard to do is to suspend your own feelings of self consciousness. The natural actors can do that; they can become part of a characterization and learn how to maintain it.
How wonderful that we have met with a paradox. Now we have some hope of making progress.
There is no science in this world like physics. Nothing comes close to the precision with which physics enables you to understand the world around you. It's the laws of physics that allow us to say exactly what time the sun is going to rise. What time the eclipse is going to begin. What time the eclipse is going to end.
Science is the great antidote to the poison of enthusiasm and superstition.
It is ... a sign of the times-though our brothers of physics and chemistry may smile to hear me say so-that biology is now a science in which theories can be devised: theories which lead to predictions and predictions which sometimes turn out to be correct. These facts confirm me in a belief I hold most passionately-that biology is the heir of all the sciences.
It should be possible to explain the laws of physics to a barmaid.
I never think of the future - it comes soon enough.
In symbols one observes an advantage in discovery which is greatest when they express the exact nature of a thing briefly and, as it were, picture it; then indeed the labor of thought is wonderfully diminished.
Before the discovery of quantum mechanics, the framework of physics was this: If you tell me how things are now, I can then use the laws of physics to calculate, and hence predict, how things will be later.
There is no true understanding of Biology without Chemistry. And there's no true understanding of Chemistry without Physics.
It has become part of the accepted wisdom to say that the twentieth century was the century of physics and the twenty-first century will be the century of biology.
The fundamental concept in social science is Power, in the same sense in which Energy is the fundamental concept in physics.
The present situation in physics is as if we know chess, but we don't know one or two rules.
In modern physics, the universe is experienced as a dynamic inseparable whole which always includes the observer in an essential way.
That's the trouble with cookbooks. Like sex education and nuclear physics, they are founded on an illusion. They bespeak order, but they end in tears.
Ancient wisdom and quantum physicists make unlikely bedfellows: In quantum mechanics the observer determines (or even brings into being) what is observed, and so, too, for the Tiwis, who dissolve the distinction between themselves and the cosmos. In quantum physics, subatomic particles influence each other from a distance, and this tallies with the aboriginal view, in which people, animals, rocks, and trees all weave together in the same interwoven fabric.
We could present spatially an atomic fact which contradicted the laws of physics, but not one which contradicted the laws of geometry.
Natural science physics contains in itself synthetical judgments a priori, as principles. ... Space then is a necessary representation a priori, which serves for the foundation of all external intuitions.
It is impossible to trap modern physics into predicting anything with perfect determinism because it deals with probabilities from the outset.
We have no right to assume that any physical laws exist, or if they have existed up until now, that they will continue to exist in a similar manner in the future.
Subscribe for the occasional hand-picked quote. No noise.