Voting rights are preservative of all other rights.
Raphael WarnockRead
Restricting access to the ballot is not good for Georgia and it's certainly not good for Georgia business.
Interpretation
What this quote means
Limiting voting access negatively impacts the state and its economy.
In this quote, Raphael Warnock emphasizes that restricting access to voting undermines not only democratic principles but also has detrimental effects on the economy and overall well-being of Georgia. He argues that a healthy democracy is essential for business prosperity, and therefore, ensuring access to the ballot is crucial for the state's growth and social cohesion.
Themes
VotingAccessDemocracyGeorgiaBusiness
In practice
Example use cases
During a speech advocating for voter rights, Warnock's quote highlights the importance of accessible voting.
More from Raphael Warnock
All quotes βWhen you look at the wealth gap - the racial wealth gap - all of that is very much connected to housing.
Raphael WarnockRead
Our rural communities are the heart of our state and too often lack equitable access to housing, transit, and economic opportunity, so I'm deeply committed to working in Washington to reverse that trend in Georgia.
Raphael WarnockRead
Voting rights is how we address the deepening divides in our country, by ensuring every eligible voter's voice is heard.
Raphael WarnockRead
Like my parishioner Congressman John Lewis, I believe that voting is a sacred undertaking, and we must keep marching until we secure the sacred right to vote for every eligible American.
Raphael WarnockRead
Racial inequity in how the immense benefits of the original G.I. Bill were disbursed are well-documented, and we've all seen how these inequities have trickled down over time, leaving Black World War II veterans and their families without the benefits they earned through service and sacrifice.
Raphael WarnockRead
Similar quotes
Compromise makes a good umbrella, but a poor roof; it is temporary expedient, often wise in party politics, almost sure to be unwise in statesmanship.
James Russell LowellRead
Conservatives say the government can't end poverty by force, but they believe it can use force to make people moral. Liberals say government can't make people be moral, but they believe it can end poverty. Neither group attempts to explain why government is so clumsy and destructive in one area but a paragon of efficiency and benevolence in the other.
Harry BrowneRead
In the 1990s, we were certain that Saddam Hussein had a nuclear arsenal. In fact, his factories could barely make soap.
Fareed ZakariaRead
I want to say, and this is very important: at the end we lucked out. It was luck that prevented nuclear war. We came that close to nuclear war at the end. Rational individuals: Kennedy was rational; Khrushchev was rational; Castro was rational. Rational individuals came that close to total destruction of their societies. And that danger exists today.
Robert McnamaraRead
It doesn't matter where we begin the personal/political circle, but it matters desperately that we complete it.
Gloria SteinemRead
Yet the basic fact remains: every regulation represents a restriction of liberty, every regulation has a cost. That is why, like marriage (in the Prayer Book's words), regulation should not "be enterprised, nor taken in hand, unadvisedly, lightly, or wantonly"
Margaret ThatcherRead