Love consists in leaving the loved one space to be themselves while providing the security within which that self may flourish.
Tony JudtRead
If active or concerned citizens forfeit politics, they thereby abandon their society to its most mediocre and venal public servants
Interpretation
Citizens must engage in politics to prevent unqualified leaders from taking control of society.
This quote by Tony Judt emphasizes the responsibility of citizens to participate in political processes. When individuals who care about their community disengage from politics, they inadvertently allow less capable and corrupt officials to dominate the system, ultimately leading to a decline in societal quality and integrity.
In practice
In a speech about civic duty, one might say, 'As Tony Judt wisely pointed out, if active citizens forfeit politics, they give way to mediocre leaders.'
Love consists in leaving the loved one space to be themselves while providing the security within which that self may flourish.
Obviously a primary liberal conviction is that we should be tolerant of other peoples' convictions. But if we believe in something, we had better find ways to say so convincingly.
Social democracy does not represent an ideal future; it does not even represent the ideal past.
What I am against is false optimism: the notion either that things have to go well, or else that they tend to, or else that the default condition of historical trajectories is characteristically beneficial in the long-run.
I'm not sure I've learned anything new about life; but I've had to think harder about death and what comes after for other people.
We are not merely historians but also and always citizens.
People see America through particular lenses, either their profession, their race or their gender. So the party that speaks to our racial perceptions and offers solutions to the racial difficulties which we face is the party that's going to be rewarded with our votes.
From horrific incidents of police brutality and complicity in indiscriminate attacks by triads on citizens to arbitrary mass arrests and the banning of demonstrations, the government has employed nearly every weapon in its war chest to intimidate Hong Kongers into silence and to suppress their popular struggle for democracy and freedom.
Actually, to be an effective person politically in this country, I think you have to be thirty or over, and also you have to be rich, well-placed, you have to be close to power. And I don't think that young people, because they look young, can do much, as I think they are counterproductive.
Major international interventions are doomed unless the US is directly or indirectly involved. But if American politicians, officials and servicemen are to be put at risk of arrest and prosecution, the United States will be most reluctant to act in order to curb aggression or prevent genocide. So the effect of the court may well be to diminish, not increase, the numbers of (in the words of the UN Secretary General) 'innocents of distant wars and conflicts'.
I don't think we can have democracies that work where most of the people are not benefiting economically, where most of the people are worried about their job security.
First of all, the world criticizes American foreign policy because Americans criticize American foreign policy. We shouldn't be surprised about that. Criticizing government is a God-given right - at least in democracies.
Subscribe for the occasional hand-picked quote. No noise.