Love consists in leaving the loved one space to be themselves while providing the security within which that self may flourish.
Tony JudtRead
If active or concerned citizens forfeit politics, they thereby abandon their society to its most mediocre and venal public servants
Interpretation
Citizens must engage in politics to prevent unqualified leaders from taking control of society.
This quote by Tony Judt emphasizes the responsibility of citizens to participate in political processes. When individuals who care about their community disengage from politics, they inadvertently allow less capable and corrupt officials to dominate the system, ultimately leading to a decline in societal quality and integrity.
In practice
In a speech about civic duty, one might say, 'As Tony Judt wisely pointed out, if active citizens forfeit politics, they give way to mediocre leaders.'
Love consists in leaving the loved one space to be themselves while providing the security within which that self may flourish.
Obviously a primary liberal conviction is that we should be tolerant of other peoples' convictions. But if we believe in something, we had better find ways to say so convincingly.
Social democracy does not represent an ideal future; it does not even represent the ideal past.
What I am against is false optimism: the notion either that things have to go well, or else that they tend to, or else that the default condition of historical trajectories is characteristically beneficial in the long-run.
I'm not sure I've learned anything new about life; but I've had to think harder about death and what comes after for other people.
We are not merely historians but also and always citizens.
We vainly fancy ourselves above the ugly informing and paranoia of the right-wing McCarthy era, but in the 21st century, the Left has fashioned a mirror image.
Politically speaking, it's always easier to shell out money for a disaster that has already happened, with clearly identifiable victims, than to invest money in protecting against something that may or may not happen in the future.
If the Queen can reject the advice of a minister on a little thing like a postage stamp, what would happen if she rejected the advice of the Prime Minister on a major matter? If the Crown personally can reject advice, then, of course, the whole democratic facade turns out to be false
The effect of that is to poison the flow of information to the President himself and to create a situation where a President can be almost, to use a metaphor, psychotically divorced from the realities in which he is acting.
The violence associated with the A.N.C. is minimal, infinitesimal next to the violence of the apartheid regime.
Elections have consequences. So many people want to complain, but they don't want to vote. We can talk about Hillary Clinton. We can celebrate her; we can support her, but if we don't come out and vote for her, for shame.
Subscribe for the occasional hand-picked quote. No noise.