The smartest groups, then, are made up of people with diverse perspectives who are able to stay independent of each other.
James SurowieckiRead
Politically speaking, it's always easier to shell out money for a disaster that has already happened, with clearly identifiable victims, than to invest money in protecting against something that may or may not happen in the future.
Interpretation
Political decisions often prioritize immediate responses to disasters over preventative measures for future risks.
In this quote, James Surowiecki highlights a common flaw in political decision-making, where leaders are more inclined to allocate funds to address past disasters, which have visible and pressing consequences, rather than investing in preventative measures for uncertain future threats. This tendency illustrates a reactive rather than proactive approach to governance, often driven by the desire for immediate impact and visible results.
In practice
During a speech on disaster management, one could quote this to emphasize the importance of prevention strategies.
The smartest groups, then, are made up of people with diverse perspectives who are able to stay independent of each other.
On the simplest level, telecommuting makes it harder for people to have the kinds of informal interactions that are crucial to the way knowledge moves through an organization. The role that hallway chat plays in driving new ideas has become a cliche of business writing, but that doesn't make it less true.
The history of the Internet is, in part, a series of opportunities missed: the major record labels let Apple take over the digital-music business; Blockbuster refused to buy Netflix for a mere fifty million dollars; Excite turned down the chance to acquire Google for less than a million dollars.
In a world where companies increasingly know about their business in real time, it makes no sense that public reporting mostly follows the old quarterly schedule. Companies sit on vital information until reporting day, at which point the market goes crazy.
Linux is a complex example of the wisdom of crowds. It's a good example in the sense that it shows you can set people to work in a decentralized way - that is, without anyone really directing their efforts in a particular direction - and still trust that they're going to come up with good answers.
It's a familiar truism that at any one moment, financial markets are dominated by either fear or greed. But the healthiest markets are those that are animated by both fear and greed at the same time.
The ultimate victory of tomorrow is democracy, and through democracy with education, for no people in all the world can be kept eternally ignorant or eternally enslaved.
I don't think anyone in the 1990s, the late '90s, anticipated that the Putin they knew then would become the Putin we know now.
Attempts are being made to turn Pakistan into a security state. If they succeed they should better rename it 'ISIstan.'
The only prize much cared for by the powerful is power. The prize of the general is not a bigger tent, but command.
A good government may, indeed, redress the grievances of an injured people; but a strong people can alone build up a great nation.
If the Tenth Amendment were still taken seriously, most of the federal government's present activities would not exist. That's why no one in Washington ever mentions it.
Subscribe for the occasional hand-picked quote. No noise.