If the code does indeed have some logical foundation then it is legitimate to consider all the evidence, both good and bad, in any attempt to deduce it.
Francis CrickRead
If you ask almost any of them, 'Do you stand behind your theory? Is this the answer?' I think almost everyone would say, 'No, no, no. I'm just trying to expand the range of possibilities.' We really don't know what's going on.
Interpretation
This quote emphasizes the uncertainty and exploratory nature of scientific theories.
In this quote, Saul Perlmutter highlights the idea that most scientists do not claim absolute certainty about their theories. Instead, they are primarily focused on expanding the range of possibilities and understanding the complexities of the universe, recognizing that there is much we still do not comprehend.
In practice
In a discussion about scientific theories at a conference.
If the code does indeed have some logical foundation then it is legitimate to consider all the evidence, both good and bad, in any attempt to deduce it.
Has there ever been a religion with the prophetic accuracy and reliability of science? . . . No other human institution comes close.
There is a reward structure in science that is very interesting: Our highest honors go to those who disprove the findings of the most revered among us. So Einstein is revered not just because he made so many fundamental contributions to science, but because he found an imperfection in the fundamental contribution of Isaac Newton.
Unlike science, creationism cannot predict anything, and it cannot provide satisfactory answers about the past.
All models are wrong, and increasingly you can succeed without them.
It is always noteworthy that all those who seriously study this science [the theory of numbers] conceive a sort of passion for it.
Subscribe for the occasional hand-picked quote. No noise.