If the code does indeed have some logical foundation then it is legitimate to consider all the evidence, both good and bad, in any attempt to deduce it.
Interpretation
The quote emphasizes the importance of considering all evidence when analyzing a theory, especially in scientific contexts.
Francis Crick, a renowned scientist, highlights the necessity of examining both positive and negative evidence when evaluating scientific theories. This approach is crucial for understanding complex ideas, as it allows one to form a more complete and accurate picture of reality. By acknowledging logical foundations, one engages in a rigorous process to derive conclusions from all available data, ensuring a deeper understanding of the evidence at hand.
In practice
In a lecture on scientific methodology, one might quote Crick to stress the balanced evaluation of evidence.
One can say, looking at the papers in this symposium, that the elucidation of the genetic code is indeed a great achievement. It is, in a sense, the key to molecular biology because it shows how the great polymer languages, the nucleic acid language and the protein language, are linked together.
Exact knowledge is the enemy of vitalism.
A theory should not attempt to explain all the facts, because some of the facts are wrong
It is essential to understand our brains in some detail if we are to assess correctly our place in this vast and complicated universe we see all around us.
To produce a really good biological theory one must try to see through the clutter produced by evolution to the basic mechanisms lying beneath them, realizing that they are likely to be overlaid by other, secondary mechanisms. What seems to physicists to be a hopelessly complicated process may have been what nature found simplest, because nature could only build on what was already there.
It has not escaped our notice that the specific pairing we have postulated immediately suggests a possible copying mechanism for the genetic material.
A big misconception is that a black hole is made of matter that has just been compacted to a very small size. That's not true. A black hole is made from warped space and time.
Science has eradicated smallpox, can immunise against most previously deadly viruses, can kill most previously deadly bacteria. Theology has done nothing but talk of pestilence as the wages of sin.
What, then, is this blue sky, which certainly does exist, and which veils from us the stars during the day?
Basic research is what I am doing when I don't know what I am doing.
Even if there were no actual evidence in favor of the Darwinian theory, we should still be justified in preferring it over all rival theories.
The history is important because science is a discipline deeply immersed in history. In other words, every time you perform an experiment in science or in medicine, what you're actually doing is you're answering someone, answering a question raised by someone in the past.
Subscribe for the occasional hand-picked quote. No noise.