An abstract painting need in 50 years by no means look "abstract" any longer.
Marcel DuchampRead
What art is, in reality, is this missing link, not the links which exist. It's not what you see that is art; art is the gap.
Interpretation
Art is not just what is visible; it represents the unseen connections and meanings.
Marcel Duchamp’s quote suggests that the essence of art lies not in superficial appearances but in the deeper meanings and emotions that art can evoke. It emphasizes the idea that art fills a void, offering insights and connections that are not immediately apparent to the observer. Rather than just presenting what is visible, art invites us to explore the intangible and the unexpressed.
In practice
In a gallery discussion, one might say, 'As Duchamp suggested, the beauty of this painting lies in what it doesn’t show, inviting viewers to engage with their own imagination.'
An abstract painting need in 50 years by no means look "abstract" any longer.
All this twaddle, the existence of God, atheism, determinism, liberation, societies, death, etc., are pieces of a chess game called language, and they are amusing only if one does not preoccupy oneself with 'winning or losing this game of chess.
I am still a victim of chess. It has all the beauty of art - and much more. It cannot be commercialized. Chess is much purer than art in its social position.
I never finished the 'Large Glass' because, after working on it for eight years, I probably got interested in something else; also, I was tired. It may be that, subconsciously, I never intended to finish it because the word 'finish' implies an acceptance of traditional methods and all the paraphernalia that accompany them.
It's a product of two poles - there's the pole of the one who makes the work, and the pole of the one who looks at it. I give the latter as much importance as the one who makes it.
I became a librarian at the Sainte-Genevieve Library in Paris. I made this gesture to rid myself of a certain milieu, a certain attitude, to have a clean conscience, but also to make a living. I was twenty-five. I had been told that one must make a living, and I believed it.
I love acting. Oh, God, I love it. But all this fame and all this bullshit attention. I'm not supernatural. I've done nothing extremely special to deserve the position. It happens every couple of years, and it's happened to hundreds of people before me.
I knew the exuberance of playing before an admiring audience and hearing my secret voice.
Art is not like other culture because its success is not made by its audience. The public fill concert halls and cinemas every day, we read novels by the millions, and buy records by the billions. 'We the people' affect the making and quality of most of our culture, but not our art.
The business of art lies just in this, -- to make that understood and felt which, in the form of an argument, might be incomprehensible and inaccessible.
My [singing] style really has no style, because I try to sing each number differently. I’ve always believed that if style takes precedent over the words and music, the audience get’s cheated. It’s like when people see a fine play or movie. They imagine themselves in the leading role. I want them to imagine that they’re singing - not just listening to someone else.
I don't know what the hell I'm doing up there half the time. These performers that go on about their technique and craft - oh, puleeze! How boring! I don't know what technique means. But I do know what experience is. I know in my gut when I've done a scene right.
Subscribe for the occasional hand-picked quote. No noise.