For scholarship - if it is to be scholarship - requires, in addition to liberty, that the truth take precedence over all sectarian interests, including self-interest.
John PolanyiRead
Our assessment of socio-economic worth is largely a sham. We scientists should not lend ourselves to it - though we routinely do. We should, instead, insist on applying the criterion of quality.
Interpretation
The value of scientific work should not be judged solely by economic factors; quality should be the primary criterion.
In this quote, John Polanyi argues that the assessment of the worth of scientific research is often distorted by socio-economic factors, and scientists frequently compromise their integrity by adhering to these assessments. He emphasizes the importance of prioritizing quality over economic value, suggesting that scientific contributions should be evaluated based on their true merit rather than their perceived financial relevance.
In practice
A scientist speaking at a conference about the importance of prioritizing research quality over funding.
For scholarship - if it is to be scholarship - requires, in addition to liberty, that the truth take precedence over all sectarian interests, including self-interest.
If we treasure our own experience and regard it as real, we must also treasure other people's experience.
It is this, at its most basic, that makes science a humane pursuit; it acknowledges the commonality of people's experience.
When, as we must often do, we fear science, we really fear ourselves.
I know that I have lived because I have felt, and, feeling giving me the knowledge of my existence.
My country right or wrong; when right, to keep her right; when wrong, to put her right.
Great God! What have I turned into? What right have you people to clutter up my life, steal my time, probe my soul, suckle my thoughts, have me for your companion, confidant, and information bureau? What do you take me for? Am I an entertainer on salary, required every evening to play an intellectual farce under your stupid noses? Am I a slave, bought and paid for, to crawl on my belly in front of you idlers and lay at your feet all that I do and all that I know?
So much of the language that surrounds us - from things like economics, management theory, and the algorithms built into computer systems - appears to be objective and neutral. But in fact, it is loaded with powerful, and very debatable, political assumptions about how society should work and what human beings are really like.
It is hard to know when we have done enough for the Atonement to change our natures and so qualify us for eternal life. And we don't know how many days we will have to give the service necessary for that mighty change to come. But we know that we will have days enough if only we don't waste them.
As a historian, I'm sceptical about conspiracy theories because the world is far too complicated to be managed by a few billionaires drinking scotch behind some closed doors. But I do think that the voters are correct in sensing that they're really losing power. And in reaction, they give the system an angry kick.
Subscribe for the occasional hand-picked quote. No noise.