Dictators fall when they're overconfident; they stay in power when they're paranoid.
Masha GessenRead
Autocratic power requires the degradation of moral authority - not the capture of moral high ground.
Interpretation
This quote highlights that authoritarian rule undermines moral values rather than striving for ethical superiority.
Masha Gessen's quote emphasizes that autocratic regimes thrive on diminishing moral authority among their citizens instead of attaining a position that is ethically superior. Such power dynamics rely on controlling narratives and subordinating moral frameworks to maintain dominance, revealing the inherent conflict between authoritarian governance and moral integrity.
In practice
In a discussion about government accountability, one might quote Gessen to illustrate the dangers of autocratic leadership.
Dictators fall when they're overconfident; they stay in power when they're paranoid.
When you lose your freedom, you lose, first and foremost, the opportunity to choose the company you keep.
There's the hypothesis that things just keep happening to Russians, things that keep turning them into the same kind of subjects, as opposed to citizens. The more credible hypothesis, I think, is that there is a kind of trauma, a social trauma that is passed on from generation to generation.
We learn to think of history as something that has already happened, to other people. Our own moment, filled as it is with minutiae destined to be forgotten, always looks smaller in comparison.
Russia, at the start of the 21st century, at least in its larger cities, very much resembled the United States of the early 1990s: being gay was no longer criminal or shameful, but it was still not a topic for polite conversation or public discussion.
... fighting for gay marriage generally involves lying about what we are going to do with marriage when we get there-because we lie that the institution of marriage is not going to change, and that is a lie. The institution of marriage is going to change, and it should change. And again, I don't think it should exist.
Any government that supports, protects or harbours terrorists is complicit in the murder of the innocent and equally guilty of terrorist crimes.
In vain they seek to hide behind the flag and the Constitution. In their blindness they forget what the flag and the Constitution stand for. Now, as always, they stand for democracy, not tyranny; for freedom, not subjection; and against a dictatorship by mob rule and the over-privileged alike.
What matters is that the majority of American people have become complacent in a senseless injustice that occurs all around them. What matters is that most American politicians have become more easily swayed by money than by the people who voted them into office.
As someone who worked hard for a Labour victory in the 90s, do I regret it? Not really. It was bound to happen. And it'll happen with the next government, and the one after it. Because all governments serve us. They serve the filth.
The history of ancient and modern republics had taught them that many of the evils which those republics suffered arose from the want of a certain balance, and that mutual control indispensable to a wise administration. They were convinced that popular assemblies are frequently misguided by ignorance, by sudden impulses, and the intrigues of ambitious men; and that some firm barrier against these operations was necessary. They, therefore, instituted your Senate.
The borders of Israel and Palestine should be based on the 1967 lines with mutually agreed swaps, so that secure and recognized borders are established for both states.
Subscribe for the occasional hand-picked quote. No noise.