Why is it that, as a culture, we are more comfortable seeing two men holding guns than holding hands?
Those who call for censorship in the name of the oppressed ought to recognize it is never the oppressed who determine the bounds of censorship.
Interpretation
What this quote means
Censorship often misrepresents the desires of the oppressed, as it is usually imposed by those in power rather than by the marginalized themselves.
In this quote, Aryeh Neier highlights the irony and complexity of censorship when it's justified as a means to protect or empower the oppressed. He suggests that those advocating for censorship often do so not truly representing the oppressed, who may not agree with their restrictions. This calls into question the motivations behind censorship and illustrates that it is typically the powerful who define what is allowed, rather than the oppressed setting the boundaries of their own voices.
Themes
In practice
Example use cases
During a seminar on freedom of expression, one could quote Neier to emphasize the importance of understanding who controls the narrative.
Similar quotes
Tramping is too easy with all this money. My days were more exciting when I was penniless and had to forage around for my next meal... I've decided that I'm going to live this life for some time to come. The freedom and simple beauty of it is just too good to pass up.
What is the Absolute? Something that appears to us in fleeting experiences--say, through the gentle smile of a beautiful woman, or even through the warm caring smile of a person who may otherwise seem ugly and rude. In such miraculous but extremely fragile moments, another dimension transpires through our reality. As such, the Absolute is easily corroded;it slips all too easily through our fingers and must be handled as carefully as a butterfly
The question of whether there exists a Creator and Ruler of the Universe has been answered in the affirmative by some of the highest intellects that have ever existed.
There is nothing more agreeable in life than to make peace with the establishment and nothing more corrupting.
The endless, useless urge to look on life comprehensively, to take a bird's-eye view of ourselves and judge the dimensions of what we have or have not done: this is life as landscape, or life as résumé. But life is incremental, and though a worthwhile life is a gathering together of all that one is, good and bad, successful and not, the paradox is that we can never really see this one thing that all of our increments (and decrements, I suppose) add up to.