Down South, there was the old 'ladies-don't-do-such-things' way of thinking. You couldn't be a lady and a good athlete at the same time.
Wilma RudolphRead
In college, I was an education major and qualified for several jobs. But the fame that came with the Olympic medals was too threatening to many people.
Interpretation
Wilma Rudolph reflects on how her Olympic fame overshadowed her academic achievements.
In this quote, Wilma Rudolph highlights the dichotomy between her academic qualifications as an education major and the competitive spotlight she garnered from her Olympic success. She suggests that while her academic accomplishments should have been celebrated, the fame associated with her athletic achievements created discomfort and intimidation among others, presumably because of the societal expectations and pressures that accompany such recognition.
In practice
This quote can be used to inspire students to pursue their passions despite external pressures.
Down South, there was the old 'ladies-don't-do-such-things' way of thinking. You couldn't be a lady and a good athlete at the same time.
When I was going through my transition of being famous, I tried to ask God, why was I here? What was my purpose? Surely, it wasn't just to win three gold medals. There has to be more to this life than that.
When the sun is shining I can do anything; no mountain is too high, no trouble too difficult to overcome.
You become world famous, and you sit with kings and queens, and then your first job is just a job. You can't go back to living the way you did before because you've been taken out of one setting and shown the other. That becomes a struggle and makes you struggle.
The triumph can't be had without the struggle.
I don't know why I run so fast. I just run.
If you're studying from a book and trying to listen in on a conversation at the same time, those are two separate projects, each started and maintained by distinct circuits in the brain. Pay more attention to one for a moment and you're automatically paying less attention to the other.
Our school systems have to realize that everybody doesn't learn the same way, and no one learns without some emotional support.
What do they teach them at these schools?
There are perhaps no days of our childhood we lived so fully as those we spent with a favorite book.
The best argument for teaching poetry is to put a three-year-old or a four-year-old and read Dr. Seuss, or Robert Louis Stevenson, and to feel how the child and you are engaging in something that's really basic to the animal, which is passing on in these rhythmic ways, something that came from somewhere.
Do you train for passing tests or do you train for creative inquiry?
Subscribe for the occasional hand-picked quote. No noise.