I am an ordinary person who has been blessed with extraordinary opportunities and experiences.
Sonia SotomayorRead
Reaching a conclusion has to start with what the parties are arguing, but examining in all situations carefully the facts as they prove them or not prove them, the record as they create it, and then making a decision that is limited to what the law says on the facts before the judge.
Interpretation
Decision-making in legal matters requires a careful examination of the facts and adherence to the law.
This quote by Sonia Sotomayor emphasizes the importance of critical examination and factual analysis in the judicial process. It highlights that while arguments may vary, a fair resolution must be anchored in the truth of the facts and the framework of the law, ensuring that decisions are made judiciously and judiciously within legal boundaries.
In practice
This quote could be referenced in a legal seminar discussing judicial decision-making processes.
I am an ordinary person who has been blessed with extraordinary opportunities and experiences.
This wealth of experiences, personal and professional, have helped me appreciate the variety of perspectives that present themselves in every case that I hear.
I was fifteen years old when I understood how it is that things break down: people can't imagine someone else's point of view.
The truth is that since childhood I had cultivated an existential independence. It came from perceiving the adults around me as unreliable, and without it I felt I wouldn't have survived. I cared deeply for everyone in my family, but in the end I depended on myself.
As you discover what strength you can draw from your community in this world from which it stands apart, look outward as well as inward. Build bridges instead of walls.
There are uses to adversity, and they don't reveal themselves until tested. Whether it's serious illness, financial hardship, or the simple constraint of parents who speak limited English, difficulty can tap unexpected strengths.
In the last analysis, our every right is only worth what our lawyer makes it worth.
The constitution is either a superior paramount law, unchangeable by ordinary means, or it is on a level with ordinary legislative acts, alterable when the legislature shall please to alter it. It is emphatically the province and duty of the judicial department to say what the law is. This is the very essence of judicial duty.
I start out with the assumption that a lawyer in a criminal case is going to be incompetent - substantially so. I find my assumption to be rarely wrong. Yet society starts out with the very opposite assumption.
On the whole, we think of our consumers - other judges, lawyers, the public. The law that the Supreme Court establishes is the law that they must live by, so all things considered, it's better to have it clearer than confusing.
Where the suspect poses no immediate threat to the officer and no threat to others, the harm resulting from the failing to apprehend him does not justify the use of deadly force to do so.
A person's mere propinquity to others independently suspected of criminal activity does not give rise to probable cause to search that person.
Subscribe for the occasional hand-picked quote. No noise.