To exclude all jurors who would be in the slightest way effected by the prospect of the death penalty would be to deprive the defendant of the impartial jury to which he or she is entitled under the law.
Byron WhiteRead
Where the suspect poses no immediate threat to the officer and no threat to others, the harm resulting from the failing to apprehend him does not justify the use of deadly force to do so.
Interpretation
What this quote means
Deadly force should not be used against a non-threatening suspect.
This quote emphasizes the idea that law enforcement officers must evaluate situations carefully and prioritize the safety and preservation of life over the urgency to apprehend a suspect who poses no immediate danger to themselves or others. It advocates for a more measured and ethical approach to the use of force in policing.
Themes
LawPolicingForceJusticeEthics
In practice
Example use cases
In a discussion about police use of force, this quote could illustrate the importance of restraint.
More from Byron White
All quotes →The law is constantly based on notions of morality, and if all laws representing essentially moral choices are to be invalidated under the due process clause, the courts will be very busy indeed.
Byron WhiteRead
The risk of racial prejudice infecting a capital sentencing proceeding is especially serious in light of the complete finality of the death sentence.
Byron WhiteRead
The Court is most vulnerable and comes nearest to illegitimacy when it deals with judge-made constitutional law having little or no cognizable roots in the language or design of the Constitution.
Byron WhiteRead
A right to jury trial is granted to criminal defendants in order to prevent oppression by the Government.
Byron WhiteRead
Sports constantly make demands on the participant for top performance, and they develop integrity, self-reliance and initiative. They teach you a lot about working in groups, without being unduly submerged in the group.
Byron WhiteRead
Similar quotes
The Sixth Amendment secures to persons charged with crime the right to be tried by an impartial jury reflecting a fair cross-section of the community.
Ruth Bader GinsburgRead
The 4th Amendment and the personal rights it secures have a long history. At the very core stands the right of a man to retreat into his own home and there be free from unreasonable governmental intrusion.
Potter StewartRead
Statutes authorizing unreasonable searches were the core concern of the framers of the 4th Amendment.
Sandra Day O'ConnorRead
Reaching a conclusion has to start with what the parties are arguing, but examining in all situations carefully the facts as they prove them or not prove them, the record as they create it, and then making a decision that is limited to what the law says on the facts before the judge.
Sonia SotomayorRead
The federal statute is invalid, for no legitimate purpose overcomes the purpose and effect to disparage and injure those whom the state, by its marriage laws, sought to protect in personhood and dignity.
Anthony KennedyRead
On the whole, we think of our consumers - other judges, lawyers, the public. The law that the Supreme Court establishes is the law that they must live by, so all things considered, it's better to have it clearer than confusing.
Ruth Bader GinsburgRead