QuoteProject
But you answer, that the Constitution recognizes property in slaves. It would be sufficient, then, to reply, that this constitutional recognition must be void, because it is repugnant to the law of nature and of nations.
William H. Seward
ShareWTF𝕏

Interpretation

What this quote means

The quote articulates a belief that constitutional recognition of slavery contradicts higher moral laws.

William H. Seward emphasizes that while the Constitution may recognize property rights in slaves, such recognition is fundamentally flawed. He argues that this constitutional provision is invalid because it contradicts universal principles of natural law and ethical standards upheld by nations, thereby underscoring the moral imperative to abolish slavery.

Themes

ConstitutionSlaveryNatural LawMoralityFreedom

In practice

Example use cases

In a debate about civil rights, one might use this quote to argue against legal justifications for slavery.

More from William H. Seward

But I deny that the Constitution recognizes property in man.
William H. SewardRead
If slavery, limited as it yet is, now threatens to subvert the Constitution, how can we as wise and prudent statesmen, enlarge its boundaries and increase its influence, and thus increase already impending dangers?
William H. SewardRead
I deem it established, then, that the Constitution does not recognize property in man, but leaves that question, as between the states, to the law of nature and of nations.
William H. SewardRead
But assuming the same premises, to wit, that all men are equal by the law of nature and of nations, the right of property in slaves falls to the ground; for one who is equal to another cannot be the owner or property of that other.
William H. SewardRead
I have learned, by some experience, that virtue and patriotism, vice and selfishness, are found in all parties, and that they differ less in their motives than in the policies they pursue.
William H. SewardRead
The two systems slave and free-labor are incompatible. They have never permanently existed together in one country, and they never can.
William H. SewardRead

Similar quotes

I condemn false prophets, I condemn the effort to take away the power of rational decision, to drain people of their free will - and a hell of a lot of money in the bargain. Religions vary in their degree of idiocy, but I reject them all. For most people, religion is nothing more than a substitute for a malfunctioning brain.
Gene RoddenberryRead
For some days I quietly worked out in my own mind the metaphysics of Cosmic Unity. The more I thought about it, the more convinced I became that it was the living truth. It was logically incontrovertible. It provided for the first time a firm foundation for ethics. It offered mankind the radical change of heart and mind that was our only hope of peace at a time of desperate danger. Only one small problem remained. I must find a way to convert the world to my way of thinking.
Freeman DysonRead
We do not see people as they are, but as they appear to us. And these appearances are usually misleading.
Robert GreeneRead
Wasting time has an esthetics to it.
Fernando PessoaRead
If one was to think constantly of death, the business of life would stand still
Samuel JohnsonRead
Here is an entirely banal idea that I think has the potential to change the world: Take evidence seriously. Taking evidence seriously does not mean privileging numbers over all other forms of knowledge - theories, narratives, images. Nor does it mean the kind of radical skepticism that questions everything to the point where no action is possible.
Abhijit BanerjeeRead

A little wisdom, now and then

Subscribe for the occasional hand-picked quote. No noise.

Quote by William H. Seward | QuoteProject