But I deny that the Constitution recognizes property in man.
William H. SewardRead
I have learned, by some experience, that virtue and patriotism, vice and selfishness, are found in all parties, and that they differ less in their motives than in the policies they pursue.
Interpretation
This quote suggests that moral character is found across all political parties, differing primarily in their approaches rather than their intentions.
William H. Seward's quote reflects on the nature of political belief and morality, asserting that both virtuous and selfish traits exist within every political faction. He emphasizes that the difference between parties is not rooted in their fundamental values or motives, but rather in the specific policies and actions they adopt in pursuit of those values.
In practice
This quote could be used in a political debate to highlight the shared human qualities across different parties.
But I deny that the Constitution recognizes property in man.
If slavery, limited as it yet is, now threatens to subvert the Constitution, how can we as wise and prudent statesmen, enlarge its boundaries and increase its influence, and thus increase already impending dangers?
But you answer, that the Constitution recognizes property in slaves. It would be sufficient, then, to reply, that this constitutional recognition must be void, because it is repugnant to the law of nature and of nations.
I deem it established, then, that the Constitution does not recognize property in man, but leaves that question, as between the states, to the law of nature and of nations.
But assuming the same premises, to wit, that all men are equal by the law of nature and of nations, the right of property in slaves falls to the ground; for one who is equal to another cannot be the owner or property of that other.
The two systems slave and free-labor are incompatible. They have never permanently existed together in one country, and they never can.
Civilization has given us enormous successes: going to the moon, technology. But then this is the civilisation that took us to debt, environmental crisis, every single crisis. We need a civilization where we say goodbye to these things.
I've always believed that who a reporter votes for, what religion they are, who they love, should not be something they have to discuss publicly.
I am opposed to all forms of control; I am for an absolute laissez faire, free, unregulated economy. I am for the separation of the state and economics, just as we had separation of state and church, which led to peaceful coexistence among different religions...so the same applies to economics. If you separate the government from economics, if you do not regulate production and trade, you will have peaceful cooperation, and harmony and justice among men.
What politicians do is they never get the rhetoric wrong, and the price they pay is they don't speak the truth as they see it. Now, I will speak truth as I see it, and sometimes I don't get the rhetoric right. I think that's a fair trade-off.
What does it matter how one comes by the truth so long as one pounces upon it and lives by it?
Lo, sleep is good, better is death--in sooth The best of all were never to be born.
Subscribe for the occasional hand-picked quote. No noise.