The world of derivatives is full of holes that very few people are really aware of. It's like hydrogen and oxygen sitting on the corner waiting for a little flame.
Charlie MungerRead
How could economics not be behavioral? If it isn't behavioral, what the hell is it?
Interpretation
Economics inherently involves human behavior and decision-making processes.
Charlie Munger emphasizes that economics cannot be separate from behavioral aspects, as economic actions are fundamentally driven by human choices and psychological factors. Without considering the behavior of individuals, economics loses its relevance and understanding of real-world applications.
In practice
In a discussion about market trends, one might say, 'As Munger pointed out, how could economics not be behavioral when our consumer choices define market demand?'
The world of derivatives is full of holes that very few people are really aware of. It's like hydrogen and oxygen sitting on the corner waiting for a little flame.
I believe in the discipline of mastering the best that other people have ever figured out. I don't believe in just sitting down and trying to dream it all up yourself. Nobody's that smart.
Economics is in many respects the queen of the soft sciences. It's expected to be better than the rest. It's my view that economics is better at the multi-disciplinary stuff than the rest of the soft science. And it's also my view that it's still lousy.
Look at this generation, with all of its electronic devices and multitasking. I will confidently predict less success than Warren, who just focused on reading.
Economics profession, they've been - they've been confident in various formulas, but economics is not physics. The same formula that works in one decade doesn't work in the next. Economics is a difficult subject.
As I talk about strengths and weaknesses in academic economics, one interesting fact you are entitled to know is that I never took a course in economics. And with this striking lack of credentials, you may wonder why I have the chutzpah to be up here giving this talk. The answer is I have a black belt in chutzpah. I was born with it.
A just wage for the worker is the ultimate test of whether any economic system is functioning justly.
All social rules and all relations between individuals are eroded by a cash economy, avarice drags Pluto himself out of the bowels of the earth.
Obama had to save the banks, sure, but he didn't have to save the bankers and the shareholders and the bondholders. We broke the rules of capitalism in order to save those at the top - as we always do.
Bankruptcy exposes the economic vulnerability and insecurity of middle class women.
Large fortunes are all founded either on the occupation of land, or lending or the taxation of labor.
Mere inflation-that is, the mere issuance of more money, with the consequence of higher wages and prices-may look like the creation of more demand. But in terms of the actual production and exchange of real things it is not.
Subscribe for the occasional hand-picked quote. No noise.