QuoteProject
If we could honestly promise young couples that we knew how to give them offspring with superior character, why should we assume they would decline? Common sense tells us that if scientists find ways to greatly improve human capabilities, there will no stopping the public from happily seizing them.
James D. Watson
ShareWTF𝕏

Interpretation

What this quote means

The quote suggests that people would embrace scientific advancements to enhance human traits if promised superior outcomes.

James D. Watson's quote emphasizes the inherent human desire for improvement and progress. It posits that if it were possible to guarantee better character traits and capabilities for future generations through scientific means, couples would likely accept such advancements without hesitation. This reflects a broader discussion about the ethical implications and public acceptance of genetic engineering and enhancement technologies.

Themes

ScienceGeneticsEnhancementHuman CapabilitiesProgress

In practice

Example use cases

During a lecture on genetic engineering, this quote can be used to illustrate public interest in scientific advancements.

More from James D. Watson

No one may have the guts to say this, but if we could make better human beings by knowing how to add genes, why shouldn't we?
James D. WatsonRead
I think the reason people are dealing with science less well now than 50 years ago is that it has become so complicated.
James D. WatsonRead
Polls consistently show that the majority of Americans favour research using embryonic stem cells and yet politicians continue to pander to the outspoken religious minority that is hampering efforts to develop this potentially valuable technology.
James D. WatsonRead
DNA was my only gold rush. I regarded DNA as worth a gold rush.
James D. WatsonRead
Science has always been my preoccupation and when you think a breakthrough is possible, it is terribly exciting.
James D. WatsonRead
If you go into science, I think you better go in with a dream that maybe you, too, will get a Nobel Prize. It's not that I went in and I thought I was very bright and I was going to get one, but I'll confess, you know, I knew what it was.
James D. WatsonRead

Similar quotes

My practise as a scientist is atheistic. That is to say, when I set up an experiment I assume that no god, angel, or devil is going to interfere with its course; and this assumption has been justified by such success as I have achieved in my professional career. I should therefore be intellectually dishonest if I were not also atheistic in the affairs of the world. And I should be a coward if I did not state my theoretical views in public.
John B. S. HaldaneRead
Cancer was not disorganized chromosomal chaos. It was organized chromosomal chaos
Siddhartha MukherjeeRead
I'm a scientist, not a theologian. I don't know if there is a God or not. Religion requires certainty. Revere and respect Gaia. Have trust in Gaia. But not faith.
James LovelockRead
Mathematics is the tool specially suited for dealing with abstract concepts of any kind and there is no limit to its power in this field.
Paul DiracRead
A scientist is as weak and human as any man, but the pursuit of science may ennoble him even against his will.
Isaac AsimovRead
Matter, though divisible in an extreme degree, is nevertheless not infinitely divisible. That is, there must be some point beyond which we cannot go in the division of matter. ... I have chosen the word “atom” to signify these ultimate particles.
John DaltonRead

A little wisdom, now and then

Subscribe for the occasional hand-picked quote. No noise.

Quote by James D. Watson | QuoteProject