No one may have the guts to say this, but if we could make better human beings by knowing how to add genes, why shouldn't we?
James D. WatsonRead
I think the reason people are dealing with science less well now than 50 years ago is that it has become so complicated.
Interpretation
Scientific knowledge has become increasingly complex, making it harder for people to engage with it.
James D. Watson points out that over the past five decades, the advancement of science has led to a degree of complexity that challenges public understanding and engagement. As scientific concepts become more intricate and specialized, they may alienate individuals who are not trained in the field, thereby creating a disconnect between the scientific community and society as a whole.
In practice
During a lecture on public science communication, this quote can illustrate the challenges faced in making scientific topics accessible.
No one may have the guts to say this, but if we could make better human beings by knowing how to add genes, why shouldn't we?
Polls consistently show that the majority of Americans favour research using embryonic stem cells and yet politicians continue to pander to the outspoken religious minority that is hampering efforts to develop this potentially valuable technology.
DNA was my only gold rush. I regarded DNA as worth a gold rush.
Science has always been my preoccupation and when you think a breakthrough is possible, it is terribly exciting.
If you go into science, I think you better go in with a dream that maybe you, too, will get a Nobel Prize. It's not that I went in and I thought I was very bright and I was going to get one, but I'll confess, you know, I knew what it was.
Take young researchers, put them together in virtual seclusion, give them an unprecedented degree of freedom and turn up the pressure by fostering competitiveness.
I remember my friend Johnny von Neumann used to say, 'with four parameters I can fit an elephant and with five I can make him wiggle his trunk.'
Dr. Kertesz mentioned to me a case known to him of a farmer who had developed prosopagnosia and in consequence could no longer distinguish (the faces of) his cows, and of another such patient, an attendant in a Natural History Museum, who mistook his own reflection for the diorama of an ape
Theory is the essence of facts. Without theory scientific knowledge would be only worthy of the madhouse.
There are no black holes in the sense of regimes from which light can't escape to infinity.
The strongest arguments prove nothing so long as the conclusions are not verified by experience. Experimental science is the queen of sciences and the goal of all speculation.
Science cuts two ways, of course; its products can be used for both good and evil. But there's no turning back from science. The early warnings about technological dangers also come from science.
Subscribe for the occasional hand-picked quote. No noise.