No one may have the guts to say this, but if we could make better human beings by knowing how to add genes, why shouldn't we?
James D. WatsonRead
I think the reason people are dealing with science less well now than 50 years ago is that it has become so complicated.
Interpretation
Scientific knowledge has become increasingly complex, making it harder for people to engage with it.
James D. Watson points out that over the past five decades, the advancement of science has led to a degree of complexity that challenges public understanding and engagement. As scientific concepts become more intricate and specialized, they may alienate individuals who are not trained in the field, thereby creating a disconnect between the scientific community and society as a whole.
In practice
During a lecture on public science communication, this quote can illustrate the challenges faced in making scientific topics accessible.
No one may have the guts to say this, but if we could make better human beings by knowing how to add genes, why shouldn't we?
Polls consistently show that the majority of Americans favour research using embryonic stem cells and yet politicians continue to pander to the outspoken religious minority that is hampering efforts to develop this potentially valuable technology.
DNA was my only gold rush. I regarded DNA as worth a gold rush.
Science has always been my preoccupation and when you think a breakthrough is possible, it is terribly exciting.
If you go into science, I think you better go in with a dream that maybe you, too, will get a Nobel Prize. It's not that I went in and I thought I was very bright and I was going to get one, but I'll confess, you know, I knew what it was.
Take young researchers, put them together in virtual seclusion, give them an unprecedented degree of freedom and turn up the pressure by fostering competitiveness.
The three-pound organ in your skull - with its pink consistency of Jell-o - is an alien kind of computational material. It is composed of miniaturized, self-configuring parts, and it vastly outstrips anything we've dreamt of building.
Science and fiction both begin with similar questions: What if? Why? How does it all work? But they focus on different areas of life on earth.
I claim that all those who think they can cherry-pick science simply don't understand how science works. That's what I claim. And if they did, they'd be less prone to just assert that somehow scientists are clueless.
The goal of scientific physicians in their own science ... is to reduce the indeterminate. Statistics therefore apply only to cases in which the cause of the facts observed is still indeterminate.
Our Western science, ever since the 17th century, has been obsessed with the notion of control, of man dominating nature. This obsession has led to disaster.
The upshot of all this is that we live in a universe whose age we can't quite compute, surrounded by stars whose distances we don't altogether know, filled with matter we can't identify, operating in conformance with physical laws whose properties we donβt truly understand.
Subscribe for the occasional hand-picked quote. No noise.