No one may have the guts to say this, but if we could make better human beings by knowing how to add genes, why shouldn't we?
James D. WatsonRead
I think the reason people are dealing with science less well now than 50 years ago is that it has become so complicated.
Interpretation
Scientific knowledge has become increasingly complex, making it harder for people to engage with it.
James D. Watson points out that over the past five decades, the advancement of science has led to a degree of complexity that challenges public understanding and engagement. As scientific concepts become more intricate and specialized, they may alienate individuals who are not trained in the field, thereby creating a disconnect between the scientific community and society as a whole.
In practice
During a lecture on public science communication, this quote can illustrate the challenges faced in making scientific topics accessible.
No one may have the guts to say this, but if we could make better human beings by knowing how to add genes, why shouldn't we?
Polls consistently show that the majority of Americans favour research using embryonic stem cells and yet politicians continue to pander to the outspoken religious minority that is hampering efforts to develop this potentially valuable technology.
DNA was my only gold rush. I regarded DNA as worth a gold rush.
Science has always been my preoccupation and when you think a breakthrough is possible, it is terribly exciting.
If you go into science, I think you better go in with a dream that maybe you, too, will get a Nobel Prize. It's not that I went in and I thought I was very bright and I was going to get one, but I'll confess, you know, I knew what it was.
Take young researchers, put them together in virtual seclusion, give them an unprecedented degree of freedom and turn up the pressure by fostering competitiveness.
Adding CO2 to the air is like throwing another blanket on the bed.
It doesn't matter what country or what political system you are from. Space brings you together.
Simplification of modes of proof is not merely an indication of advance in our knowledge of a subject, but is also the surest guarantee of readiness for farther progress.
In order to figure out how to make atoms compute, you have to learn how to speak their language and to understand how they process information under normal circumstances.
The image of the scientist who puts the pursuit of truth before anything else has been shattered and replaced by a man on the make or a quasi-religious enthusiast who wants to prove his case at any cost. Science is becoming the tool of campaigning warfare, in which truth is the first casualty.
To come very near to a true theory, and to grasp its precise application, are two different things, as the history of science teaches us. Everything of importance has been said before by someone who did not discover it.
Subscribe for the occasional hand-picked quote. No noise.