Create your own visual style... let it be unique for yourself and yet identifiable for others.
Criminals are never very amusing. It's because they're failures. Those who make real money aren't counted as criminals. This is a class distinction, not an ethical problem.
Interpretation
What this quote means
The quote highlights the difference between societal perceptions of crime and success, suggesting that true criminals are often deemed failures in the eyes of society.
Orson Welles points out that what society deems as criminal behavior often stems from a failure to achieve success through traditional means. He argues that those who are truly successful and wealthy are not typically labeled as criminals, indicating a societal class distinction that prioritizes financial success over ethical considerations. Thus, this perspective challenges the ethical implications of criminality, suggesting that societal values shape our understanding of success and failure.
Themes
In practice
Example use cases
In a discussion about wealth disparity, one might quote this to illustrate societal biases.
More from Orson Welles
All quotes βWhen people accept breaking the law as normal, something happens to the whole society.
A writer needs a pen, an artist needs a brush, but a filmmaker needs an army.
I passionately hate the idea of being with it; I think an artist has always to be out of step with his time.
Old age is the only disease you dont want to be cured of.
Movie directing is a perfect refuge for the mediocre.
Similar quotes
And so it is they who, between them, give me all the reasons for believing in none.
It is not the cause for which men took up arms that makes a victory more just or less, it is the order that is established when arms have been laid down.
All men are by nature equal, made all of the same earth by one Workman; and however we deceive ourselves, as dear unto God is the poor peasant as the mighty prince.
The serious people who took him seriously never felt quite sure of his deportment; they were somehow aware that trusting their reputations for judgment with him was like furnishing a nursery with egg-shell china.
I will show you fear in a handful of dust.
If something were brought about without an antecedent cause, it would be untrue that all things come about through fate. But if it is plausible that all events have an antecedent cause, what ground can be offered for not conceding that all things come about through fate?