An abstract painting need in 50 years by no means look "abstract" any longer.
Marcel DuchampRead
In the beginning, the cubists broke up form without even knowing they were doing it. Probably the compulsion to show multiple sides of an object forced us to break the object up - or, even better, to project a panorama that unfolded different facets of the same object.
Interpretation
The cubists revolutionized the representation of objects by depicting them from multiple perspectives simultaneously.
Marcel Duchamp's reflection on cubism emphasizes how the movement's artists instinctively fragmented forms to capture the complexity of objects, revealing different angles and aspects that could not be seen from a single viewpoint. This method reveals a deeper understanding of perception and challenges traditional notions of representation in art.
In practice
In an art critique, one might refer to this quote to discuss the impact of cubism on modern art.
An abstract painting need in 50 years by no means look "abstract" any longer.
All this twaddle, the existence of God, atheism, determinism, liberation, societies, death, etc., are pieces of a chess game called language, and they are amusing only if one does not preoccupy oneself with 'winning or losing this game of chess.
I am still a victim of chess. It has all the beauty of art - and much more. It cannot be commercialized. Chess is much purer than art in its social position.
I never finished the 'Large Glass' because, after working on it for eight years, I probably got interested in something else; also, I was tired. It may be that, subconsciously, I never intended to finish it because the word 'finish' implies an acceptance of traditional methods and all the paraphernalia that accompany them.
It's a product of two poles - there's the pole of the one who makes the work, and the pole of the one who looks at it. I give the latter as much importance as the one who makes it.
I became a librarian at the Sainte-Genevieve Library in Paris. I made this gesture to rid myself of a certain milieu, a certain attitude, to have a clean conscience, but also to make a living. I was twenty-five. I had been told that one must make a living, and I believed it.
One mustn't always believe that feeling is everything. In the arts, it is nothing without form.
I cannot pursue my architecture without considering the minimization of energy consumption, simple and direct technologies, a respect for site, climate, place and culture. Together, these disciplines represent for me a fantastic platform for experimentation and expression. Of particular importance is the junction of the rational and the poetic resulting hopefully in works that resonate and belong to where they reside.
Dogmatism of all kinds--scientific, economic, moral, as well as political--are threatened by the creative freedom of the artist. This is necessarily and inevitably so. We cannot escape our anxiety over the fact that the artists together with creative persons of all sorts, are the possible destroyer of our nicely ordered systems. (p. 76)
Drawing is rather like playing chess: your mind races ahead of the moves that you eventually make.
Life and people are complex. A writer as an artist doesn't have the personality of a politician. We don't see the world that simply.
You sang in church, you know, and you didn't act at all. You tried not to act, you tried to tell the truth. The idea of being a troubadour on the road singing for your supper was very disturbing to him.
Subscribe for the occasional hand-picked quote. No noise.