Physicians think they do a lot for a patient when they give his disease a name.
Immanuel KantRead
Democracy is necessarily despotism, as it establishes an executive power contrary to the general will; all being able to decide against one whose opinion may differ, the will of all is therefore not that of all: which is contradictory and opposite to liberty.
Interpretation
Kant argues that democracy can lead to oppression when the majority overpowers minority opinions, contradicting true freedom.
In this quote, Immanuel Kant reflects on the complexities of democratic systems, suggesting that the tyranny of the majority undermines individual liberty. He posits that while democracy allows collective decision-making, it can lead to an oppressive environment for dissenting voices, thus creating a form of despotism that contradicts the essence of true freedom.
In practice
In a discussion on political philosophy, one might reference this quote to highlight the dangers of majority rule.
Physicians think they do a lot for a patient when they give his disease a name.
The inscrutable wisdom through which we exist is not less worthy of veneration in respect to what it denies us than in respect to what it has granted.
One cannot avoid a certain feeling of disgust, when one observes the actions of man displayed on the great stage of the world. Wisdom is manifested by individuals here and there; but the web of human history as a whole appears to be woven from folly and childish vanity, often, too, from puerile wickedness and love of destruction: with the result that at the end one is puzzled to know what idea to form of our species which prides itself so much on its advantages.
I shall never forget my mother, for it was she who planted and nurtured the first seeds of good within me. She opened my heart to the lasting impressions of nature; she awakened my understanding and extended my horizon and her percepts exerted an everlasting influence upon the course of my life.
. . . as to moral feeling, this supposed special sense, the appeal to it is indeed superficial when those who cannot think believe that feeling will help them out, even in what concerns general laws: and besides, feelings which naturally differ infinitely in degree cannot furnish a uniform standard of good and evil, nor has any one a right to form judgments for others by his own feelings. . . .
Two things fill the mind with ever new and increasing admiration and awe, the oftener and more steadily we reflect on them: the starry heavens above me and the moral law within me.
In the name of what - except perhaps the coefficient of rarity - does man adorn himself with necklaces of shells and not spider's webs, with fox fur and not fox innards? In the name of what I don't know. Don't dirt, trash and filth, which are man's companions during his whole lifetime, deserve to be dearer to him and isn't it serving him well to remind him of their beauty?
No people is wholly civilized where a distinction is drawn between stealing an office and stealing a purse.
There is not a crime, there is not a dodge, there is not a trick, there is not a swindle, there is not a vice which does not live by secrecy.
A comfortable, convenient life is not a real life - the more comfortable, the less alive. The most comfortable life is in the grave.
They're so cold, these scholars! May lightning strike their food so that their mouths learn how to eat fire!
You live in the age of interdependence. Borders don't count for much or stop much, good or bad, anymore.
Subscribe for the occasional hand-picked quote. No noise.