(The difficulty over the question of eternal torments lies in) how it is irreconcilable with the Goodness of God, to put any Persons at all upon a necessity of making such an Option, wherein if they choose amiss, the Misery they incur must be irrevocable.
Interpretation
The quote discusses the moral dilemma of eternal punishment and God's goodness.
Samuel Clarke presents a profound question about the nature of divine justice and the concept of eternal torment. He argues that it seems inconsistent with the goodness of God to force individuals into making choices that could lead to irreversible suffering, thus highlighting the moral implications of free will and divine punishment within a theological context.
In practice
In a theological debate about the nature of hell and justice, this quote can serve to illustrate the clash between divine goodness and the concept of eternal punishment.
I believe strongly in 'giving while living.' I see little reason to delay giving when so much good can be achieved through supporting worthwhile causes today. Besides, it's a lot more fun to give while you live than to give while you are dead.
It seems not more reasonable to leave the right of printing unrestrained, because writers may be afterwards censured, than it would be to sleep with doors unbolted, because by our laws we can hang a thief.
Balk the enemy's power; force him to reveal himself.
What are you so mad about? That we still have a government? We still have “traffic lights.” We’re sorry. The government’s not perfect, but some people wish it was better, not gone.
As days lengthen into weeks and months and even years of adversity, the hurt grows deeper. The Church cannot hope to save a man on Sunday if during the week it is a complacent witness to the crucifixion of his soul.
Man should be master of his environment, not its slave. That is what freedom means.
Subscribe for the occasional hand-picked quote. No noise.