I think that in the discussion of natural problems we ought to begin not with the Scriptures, but with experiments, and demonstrations.
Interpretation
Galileo emphasizes the importance of empirical evidence over religious or scriptural beliefs in understanding nature.
In this quote, Galileo Galilei advocates for a scientific approach to understanding the natural world, suggesting that discussions about natural phenomena should start with direct observation and experimentation rather than relying on religious texts. This reflects the foundational principles of the scientific method, where evidence and experimentation lead to knowledge and understanding, challenging the dominant views of previously established authority.
In practice
In a lecture about the scientific method, you might say, 'As Galileo once stated, we must begin our discussions about nature with observations before any scripture.'
It has always seemed to me extreme presumptuousness on the part of those who want to make human ability the measure of what nature can and knows how to do, since, when one comes down to it, there is not one effect in nature, no matter how small, that even the most speculative minds can fully understand.
We must say that there are as many squares as there are numbers.
Science proceeds more by what it has learned to ignore than what it takes into account.
The sun, with all those planets revolving around it and dependent on it, can still ripen a bunch of grapes as if it had nothing else in the universe to do.
Philosophy is written in this grand book, the universe, which stands continually open to our gaze. But the book cannot be understood unless one first learns to comprehend the language and read the letters in which it is composed.
That sculpture is more admirable than painting for the reason that it contains relief and painting does not is completely false. ... Rather, how much more admirable the painting must be considered, if having no relief at all, it appears to have as much as sculpture!
One of the liberating effects of science fiction when I was a teenager was precisely its ability to tune me into all sorts of strange data and make me realize that I wasnβt as totally isolated in perceiving the world as being monstrous and crazy
The brain of man, like that of all animals is double, being parted down its centre by a thin membrane. For this reason pain is not always felt in the same part of the head, but sometimes on one side, sometimes on the other, and occasionally all over.
Perhaps one day I will go into space.
Science fiction writers aren't fortune tellers. Fortune tellers are fakes.
I often compare open source to science. To where science took this whole notion of developing ideas in the open and improving on other peoples' ideas and making it into what science is today and the incredible advances that we have had. And I compare that to witchcraft and alchemy, where openness was something you didn't do.
Remember that [scientific thought] is the guide of action; that the truth which it arrives at is not that which we can ideally contemplate without error, but that which we may act upon without fear; and you cannot fail to see that scientific thought is not an accompaniment or condition of human progress, but human progress itself.
Subscribe for the occasional hand-picked quote. No noise.