Closing the confidence gap means being honest about your abilities, not constantly undervaluing them.
Economists argue about the relative impact of immigrants versus robots on wage stagnation - voters don't care much. They blame immigrants. It's easier to get mad at a person from Macedonia or Mexico, taking your job than it is to get mad at a piece of technology from Silicon Valley.
Interpretation
What this quote means
People often blame immigrants for job loss instead of acknowledging the role of technology.
In this quote, Katty Kay highlights the tendency of individuals to attribute wage stagnation to immigrants rather than the influence of technological advancements. This reflects a common psychological bias where humans are more likely to direct their frustration towards identifiable individuals rather than abstract concepts or innovations. As immigrants become scapegoats for economic challenges, the real complexities behind wage dynamics are often overlooked, revealing a deeper societal issue regarding blame and accountability.
Themes
In practice
Example use cases
During a panel discussion on economic policy, this quote can be used to highlight the need for nuanced understanding of job market challenges.
More from Katty Kay
All quotes →Every woman dreams of a workplace where her boss doesn't suggest they grab a drink after work, where there isn't that colleague you'd just rather not get stuck in the office with alone and where your job prospects don't depend, however subtly, on whether you put up with lascivious comments from a man who has power over you.
Ive lived and worked in developing countries so Im particularly interested in helping women in oppressive societies. Our problems can pale in comparison to theirs, the more we can do to empower them, the better off all women will be.
I honestly do not know a woman, in any profession, at any level, who has not at some point, often at many points, had to repudiate the unwanted advances of a man they've worked with or for. We shouldn't have to.
Similar quotes
How can government reduce the frequency and the severity of future catastrophes? Companies that have the potential to create significant harm must be required to pay for the costs they inflict, either before or after the fact. Economists agree on this general approach. The problem is in putting such a policy into effect.
In the 1930s, unemployed working people could anticipate that their jobs would come back.
With neoliberalism discredited and austerity failed, we need to rewrite the rules of the economy once again. But this time in the right way. We need rules that focus on long-term economic growth, and the only kind of sustainable prosperity is shared prosperity.
In a globalized economy, jobs no longer need a passport, but workers do.
The real bosses, in the capitalist system of market economy, are the consumers.
It is better that a man should tyrannize over his bank balance than over his fellow-citizens.