Elegance has nothing to do with fashion.
Interpretation
Elegance transcends the superficial aspects of fashion.
Karl Lagerfeld's quote emphasizes that true elegance is not defined by current fashion trends or styles, but rather by a timeless quality of grace and sophistication that comes from within an individual. It suggests that one can be elegant regardless of what is being worn, highlighting the importance of personal expression and character over mere aesthetics.
In practice
In a presentation about timeless style, you can use this quote to emphasize the difference between fashion and true elegance.
I believe in sketching because there is something very sensitive in sketching, you know, in sketches that you don't have out of a computer that looks the same like everybody even if, later on, the dresses are OK, but I like to sketch, and I like to see trails made after my sketches that look the same. It is you know, what I like.
I'm open to everything. When you start to criticize the times you live in, your time is over.
If I could be reincarnated as a fashion accessory, it would be a shopping bag.
Chic is a kind of mayonnaise, either it tastes, or it doesn't.
Why should I stop working? If I do, I'll die and it'll all be finished. 'm lucky to work in the most perfect of conditions. I can do what I want in all kinds of areas. The expenses are not expenses. I would be stupid to stop that. Work is making a living out of being bored.
Itβs up to you to make everyday as perfect as possible. _x000D_ Itβs a question of will and discipline.
Poets are the hierophants of an unapprehended inspiration; the mirrors of the gigantic shadows which futurity casts upon the present; the words which express what they understand not; the trumpets which sing to battle, and feel not what they inspire; the influence which is moved not, but moves. Poets are the unacknowledged legislators of the world.
I think if you say that art and politics, or religion and politics, mustn't mix, don't mix, that is itself a political statement. Even if you are writing a 19th-century novel where the money comes from a plantation in the Caribbean and you don't talk about that, that itself is a political thing.
I thought that was a pretty stupid argument, really, because it's the final product that matters. The look of the film, however it's done, is still the cinematographer's vision in my mind. People said the same when color film came in, didn't they? The world evolves, and image-making evolves.
Digital photography is, by definition, unfinished. You don't feel that after every 24 or 36 shots you have to change your film - you know you can go on for ever if you want. You can see the result immediately, and find out if your original idea is worth going on with or not, whether it can be corrected, whether it can be improved.
The flower you single out is a rejection of all other flowers; nevertheless, only on these terms is it beautiful.
I paint people, not because of what they are like, not exactly in spite of what they are like, but how they happen to be.
Subscribe for the occasional hand-picked quote. No noise.