My father so appropriately put it that we are certainly the only animal that makes conscious choices that are bad for our survival as a species.
Louise LeakeyRead
If you want to become a fossil, you actually need to die somewhere where your bones will be rapidly buried. You then hope that the earth moves in such a way as to bring the bones back up to the surface. And then you hope that one of us lot will walk around and find small pieces of you.
Interpretation
Fossilization is a rare process that requires specific conditions to preserve remains for future discovery.
This quote by Louise Leakey highlights the intricate and improbable conditions necessary for fossilization. It emphasizes the importance of environment and timing in the preservation of life forms over geological time, as well as the complexities involved in how we come to discover and understand our ancient ancestors through fossil records.
In practice
This quote could be used in a scientific presentation about paleontology.
My father so appropriately put it that we are certainly the only animal that makes conscious choices that are bad for our survival as a species.
I think when you work on fossils, and you realize that a species is there, and it's abundant for quite a long period of time, and then at some point it's no longer there - and so, when you look at that bigger picture, yes, you realize that either you change and adapt, or, as a species, you go extinct.
Should a young scientist working with me come to me after two years of such work and ask me what to do next, I would advise him to get out of science. After two years of work, if a man does not know what to do next, he will never make a real scientist.
A great part of its theories derives an additional charm from the peculiarity that important propositions, with the impress of simplicity on them, are often easily discovered by induction, and yet are of so profound a character that we cannot find the demonstrations till after many vain attempts; and even then, when we do succeed, it is often by some tedious and artificial process, while the simple methods may long remain concealed.
As agonizing a disease as cancer is, I do not think it can be said that our civilization is threatened by it. ... But a very plausible case can be made that our civilization is fundamentally threatened by the lack of adequate fertility control. Exponential increases of population will dominate any arithmetic increases, even those brought about by heroic technological initiatives, in the availability of food and resources, as Malthus long ago realized.
The way I see it, commercial interests should manage a lunar base while NASA gets on with the really important task of flying to Mars.
Science is a beautiful gift to humanity; we should not distort it.
In my Nobel lecture, I suggested we had until the year 2000 to tame the population monster, and then food shortages would take us under. Now I believe we have a little longer.
Subscribe for the occasional hand-picked quote. No noise.