Patience patience quotes is bitter, but its fruit is sweet.
Jean-Jacques RousseauRead
Frequent punishments are always a sign of weakness or laziness on the part of a government.
Interpretation
The quote suggests that a government that frequently punishes its people is failing in its duty to govern effectively.
Jean-Jacques Rousseau's quote critiques the nature of government authority, asserting that excessive reliance on punishment indicates a deeper weakness or incompetence within the governing body. Instead of creating a just and effective society, a government that resorts to frequent punishment reveals its inability to foster cooperation and understanding among its citizens, pointing to a lack of legitimate authority and moral strength.
In practice
In a discussion about the role of government in society.
Patience patience quotes is bitter, but its fruit is sweet.
The infant, on opening his eyes, ought to see his country, and to the hour of his death never lose sight of it.
What wisdom can you find that is greater than kindness?
O love, if I regret the age when one savors you, it is not for the hour of pleasure, but for the one that follows it.
Those people who treat politics and morality separately will never understand either of them.
As evening approached, I came down from the heights of the island, and I liked then to go and sit on the shingle in some secluded spot by the lake; there the noise of the waves and the movement of the water, taking hold of my senses and driving all other agitation from my soul, would plunge me into delicious reverie in which night often stole upon me unawares.
A straight oar looks bent in the water. What matters is not merely that we see things but how we see them.
Vaulting ambition, which o'erleaps itself And falls on the other side
In all forms of strategy, it is necessary to maintain the combat stance in everyday life and to make your everyday stance your combat stance.
It is this idea 'decency' should be attached to wealth -and 'indecency'' to poverty - that forms the core of one strand of skeptical complaint against the modern status-ideal. Why should failure to make money be taken as a sign of an unconditionally flawed human being rather than of a fiasco in one particular area if the far larger, more multifaceted, project of leading a good life? Why should both wealth and poverty be read as the predominant guides to an individual's morals ?
There are big questions science doesn't answer, such as why is there something rather than nothing? There can't be a scientific answer to that because it's the answer that precedes science.
Human beings cannot be willed and molded into non-existence.
Subscribe for the occasional hand-picked quote. No noise.