Who does not know the evils of war cannot appreciate its benefits.
Sun TzuRead
Generally in war the best policy is to take a state intact; to ruin it is inferior to this.
Interpretation
In warfare, it is wiser to maintain the integrity of a state rather than to destroy it.
This quote by Sun Tzu emphasizes the importance of preserving the strength and resources of a state in war. Instead of focusing on total destruction, which can be counterproductive, the strategy should aim at gaining control while allowing the state to remain functional, ultimately leading to better outcomes in governance and resource management after the conflict.
In practice
In a discussion about military strategy at a conference.
Who does not know the evils of war cannot appreciate its benefits.
Great results, can be achieved with small forces.
To capture an enemies army is better than to destroy it.
The general who wins the battle makes many calculations in his temple before the battle is fought. The general who loses makes but few calculations beforehand.
You can ensure the success of your attacks if you only attack places that are undefended. You can ensure the safety of your defense if you only hold positions that cannot be attacked. Therefore, that general is skillful in attack whose opponent does not know what to defend; and he is skillful in defense whose opponent does not know what to attack.
If you know the enemy and know yourself, you need not fear the result of a hundred battles. If you know yourself but not the enemy, for every victory gained you will also suffer a defeat. If you know neither the enemy nor yourself, you will succumb in every battle.
I believe that national sovereignties will shrink in the face of universal interdependence.
Word is murder of a thing, not only in the elementary sense of implying its absence - by naming a thing, we treat it as absent, as dead, although it is still present - but above all in the sense of its radical dissection: the word 'quarters' the thing, it tears it out of the embedment in its concrete context, it treats its component parts as entities with an autonomous existence: we speak about color, form, shape, etc., as if they possessed self-sufficient being.
All is mine but nothing owned, nothing owned for memory, and mine only while I look.
Solitude is different from loneliness, and it doesn't have to be a lonely kind of thing.
I have a different idea of a universal. It is of a universal rich with all that is particular, rich with all the particulars there are, the deepening of each particular, the coexistence of them all.
Death is the destination we all share, no one has ever escaped it. And that is as it should be because death is very likely the single best invention of life.
Subscribe for the occasional hand-picked quote. No noise.