The function of the press in society is to inform, but its role in society is to make money.
A. J. LieblingRead
I take a grave view of the press. It is the weak slat under the bed of democracy
Interpretation
The press plays a crucial role in democracy, but it can also weaken it if not held to high standards.
A. J. Liebling's quote reveals a critical perspective on the media's role in democratic societies. He suggests that while the press is essential for informing the public and upholding democracy, it can also be a weak link that compromises the integrity of democratic processes if not properly scrutinized and held accountable. The metaphor of a 'weak slat under the bed' implies that a fragile press can undermine the stability and strength of democratic foundations.
In practice
This quote could be used in a discussion about the role of media in political campaigns.
The function of the press in society is to inform, but its role in society is to make money.
The primary requisite for writing well about food is a good appetite. Without this, it is impossible to accumulate, within the allotted span, enough experience of eating to have anything worth setting down.
No sane man can afford to dispense with debilitating pleasures. No ascetic can be considered reliably sane.
A city with one newspaper... is like a man with one eye, and often the eye is glass.
A city with one newspaper, or with a morning and an evening paper under one ownership, is like a man with one eye, and often the eye is glass.
Freedom of the press is guaranteed only to those who own one.
Empires do not suffer emptiness of purpose at the time of their creation. It is when they have become established that aims are lost and replaced by vague ritual.
I took a deep breath and listened to the old bray of my heart. I am. I am. I am.
I'm fed up to the ears with old men dreaming up wars for young men to die in.
To be a Christian is a standing, a legal position. It means to be a child of God. You are or you are not, there is no try.
We know of no spectacle more ridiculous—or more contemptible—than that of the religious reactionaries who dare to re-write the history of our republic. Or who try to do so. Is it possible that, in their vanity and stupidity, they suppose that they can erase the name of Thomas Jefferson and replace it with the name of some faith-based mediocrity whose name is already obscure? If so, we cheerfully resolve to mock them, and to give them the lie in their teeth.
The Court is most vulnerable and comes nearest to illegitimacy when it deals with judge-made constitutional law having little or no cognizable roots in the language or design of the Constitution.
Subscribe for the occasional hand-picked quote. No noise.