Is the minor convenience of allowing the present generation the luxury of doubling its energy consumption every 10 years worth the major hazard of exposing the next 20,000 generations to this lethal waste?
What we are finding out now is that there are not only limits to growth but also to technology and that we cannot allow technology to go on without public consent.
Interpretation
What this quote means
This quote emphasizes the need for public consent regarding technological advancements, drawing attention to the limits of both growth and technology.
David R. Brower's quote highlights the critical importance of public engagement and approval in the development and application of technology. It suggests that while we can strive for growth and advancements, we must recognize that both growth and technology have inherent limits, and it is essential to ensure that technological progress aligns with societal values and public consensus to prevent potential negative consequences.
Themes
In practice
Example use cases
In a speech about sustainable development, you might say, 'As David R. Brower wisely pointed out, we must not let technology evolve without our collective agreement.'
More from David R. Brower
All quotes →Perhaps most ridiculous of all is the suggestion that we 'keep' our radioactive garbage for the use of our descendants. This 'solution', I think, requires an immediate poll of the next 20,000 generations.
Without wilderness, the world's a cage.
To me, a wilderness is where the flow of wildness is essentially uninterrupted by technology; without wilderness the world is a cage.
Similar quotes
... the Kindle is a "roach motel" device: its license terms and DRM ensure that books can check in, but they can't check out.
Smart infrastructure can provide cost-saving ways for municipalities to handle both infrastructure and social needs. And we want to shift the systems that open the doors for people who were formerly tax burdens to become part of the tax base.
For many oppositional movements, the Internet, while providing the opportunity to distribute information more quickly and cheaper, may have actually made their struggle more difficult in the long run.
Every program has (at least) two purposes: the one for which it was written and another for which it wasn't.
Languages evolve; ideas blend together. In computer technology, we all stand on others' shoulders.
Ultimately, it's not going to be about man versus machine. It is going to be about man with machines.