Is the minor convenience of allowing the present generation the luxury of doubling its energy consumption every 10 years worth the major hazard of exposing the next 20,000 generations to this lethal waste?
What we are finding out now is that there are not only limits to growth but also to technology and that we cannot allow technology to go on without public consent.
Interpretation
What this quote means
This quote emphasizes the need for public consent regarding technological advancements, drawing attention to the limits of both growth and technology.
David R. Brower's quote highlights the critical importance of public engagement and approval in the development and application of technology. It suggests that while we can strive for growth and advancements, we must recognize that both growth and technology have inherent limits, and it is essential to ensure that technological progress aligns with societal values and public consensus to prevent potential negative consequences.
Themes
In practice
Example use cases
In a speech about sustainable development, you might say, 'As David R. Brower wisely pointed out, we must not let technology evolve without our collective agreement.'
More from David R. Brower
All quotes →Perhaps most ridiculous of all is the suggestion that we 'keep' our radioactive garbage for the use of our descendants. This 'solution', I think, requires an immediate poll of the next 20,000 generations.
Without wilderness, the world's a cage.
To me, a wilderness is where the flow of wildness is essentially uninterrupted by technology; without wilderness the world is a cage.
Similar quotes
Technology is not an image of the world but a way of operating on reality. The nihilism of technology lies not only in the fact that it is the most perfect expression of the will to power... but also in the fact that it lacks meaning.
When Paul Allen and I started Microsoft over 30 years ago, we had big dreams about software. We had dreams about the impact it could have.
There's no magic line between an application and an operating system that some bureaucrat in Washington should draw.
Customers need to be given control of their own data-not being tied into a certain manufacturer so that when there are problems they are always obliged to go back to them.
Why commit technological suicide by restricting the flow of talent into the United States?
Internet TV and the move to the digital approach is quite revolutionary. TV has historically has been a broadcast medium with everybody picking from a very finite number of channels.