Is the minor convenience of allowing the present generation the luxury of doubling its energy consumption every 10 years worth the major hazard of exposing the next 20,000 generations to this lethal waste?
What we are finding out now is that there are not only limits to growth but also to technology and that we cannot allow technology to go on without public consent.
Interpretation
What this quote means
This quote emphasizes the need for public consent regarding technological advancements, drawing attention to the limits of both growth and technology.
David R. Brower's quote highlights the critical importance of public engagement and approval in the development and application of technology. It suggests that while we can strive for growth and advancements, we must recognize that both growth and technology have inherent limits, and it is essential to ensure that technological progress aligns with societal values and public consensus to prevent potential negative consequences.
Themes
In practice
Example use cases
In a speech about sustainable development, you might say, 'As David R. Brower wisely pointed out, we must not let technology evolve without our collective agreement.'
More from David R. Brower
All quotes →Perhaps most ridiculous of all is the suggestion that we 'keep' our radioactive garbage for the use of our descendants. This 'solution', I think, requires an immediate poll of the next 20,000 generations.
Without wilderness, the world's a cage.
To me, a wilderness is where the flow of wildness is essentially uninterrupted by technology; without wilderness the world is a cage.
Similar quotes
I think a lot of the time there isn't such a black-and-white difference between what's a platform and what's an app. It's really just like the most important apps become platforms.
I am hoping, though, that many of them have kids, who, when they have a moment to take a break from their iPods, Internet, or Google, will explain to their parents running the country just how the world is being flattened.
An awful lot of successful technology companies ended up being in a slightly different market than they started out in.
A few years ago, users of Internet services began to realize that when an online service is free, you're not the customer. You're the product.
The Net interprets censorship as damage and routes around it.
Nobody wants to buy a $60,000 electric Civic. But people will pay $90,000 for an electric sports car.