The Dell Theory of Conflict Prevention argues that no two countries that are both part of the same global supply chain will ever fight a war as long as they are each part of that supply chain.
Thomas FriedmanRead
I am hoping, though, that many of them have kids, who, when they have a moment to take a break from their iPods, Internet, or Google, will explain to their parents running the country just how the world is being flattened.
Interpretation
The quote expresses a hope that the younger generation will help their parents understand the impact of globalization brought on by technology.
Thomas Friedman's quote highlights the role of technology in shaping the modern world and emphasizes the importance of the youth in informing and educating their parents about the realities of globalization. He suggests that amidst distractions from gadgets and the internet, children have the potential to articulate the changes and challenges of a 'flattened' world, defined by increased connectivity and shared experiences across borders.
In practice
During a discussion on globalization at a school event.
The Dell Theory of Conflict Prevention argues that no two countries that are both part of the same global supply chain will ever fight a war as long as they are each part of that supply chain.
When it comes to dealing with the world's climate and energy challenges, I have a simple rule: change America, change the world.
The hidden hand of the market will never work without a hidden fist -- McDonald's cannot flourish without McDonnell Douglas, the builder of the F-15. And the hidden fist that keeps the world safe for Silicon Valley's technologies is called the United States Army, Air Force, Navy and Marine Corps.
Do you know what my favorite renewable fuel is? An ecosystem for innovation.
If you don't visit the bad neighborhoods, the bad neighborhoods are going to visit you.
Inspiring conduct has so much more of an impact than coercing it.
In technology, we spend so much time experimenting, fine-tuning, getting the absolute cheapest way to do something - so why aren't we doing that with social policy?
Technology has moved away from sharing and toward ownership. This suits software and hardware companies just fine: They create new, bloated programs that require more disk space and processing power. We buy bigger, faster computers, which then require more complex operating systems, and so on.
You don't get to cut that chain of evidence and start over. You're always going to be pursued by your data shadow, which is forming from thousands and thousands of little leaks and tributaries of information.
The critical question is: How do we ensure that the Internet develops in a way that is compatible with democracy?
Technology is, in many respects, an enabler for an open, transparent society. But it's also an enabler for supervision to a completely unforeseen degree. And for commercialising personal space to an unforeseen degree.
Technology is far more than a method, it is a world in itself. As a method, it is superior in almost every respect. But only where it is left to itself, as in gigantic structures of engineering, there technology reveals its true nature.
Subscribe for the occasional hand-picked quote. No noise.