Since the model he so faithfully copies is not going to be hung up next to the picture... it is of no interest whether it is an accurate copy of the model.
Lucian FreudRead
I have a hatred of habit and routine. And what dogs love is just that. They like regular everything, and I don't have regular anything. I have a timetable, but no routine.
Interpretation
The quote expresses a conflict between the speaker's aversion to routine and the inherent nature of dogs, who thrive on regularity.
Lucian Freud conveys his disdain for monotony and habitual patterns in life, contrasting it with the nature of dogs, which find comfort and security in routine. This reflection suggests a deeper philosophical inquiry into the human experience of freedom versus the structured existence that many beings, including animals, seem to prefer.
In practice
This quote could be used in a conversation about personal growth and the importance of breaking free from routine.
Since the model he so faithfully copies is not going to be hung up next to the picture... it is of no interest whether it is an accurate copy of the model.
When I look at a body it gives me choice of what to put in a painting, what will suit me and what won't. There is a distinction between fact and truth. Truth has an element of revelation about it. If something is true, it does more than strike one as merely being so.
It is the only point of getting up every morning: to paint, to make something good, to make something even better than before, not to give up, to compete, to be ambitious.
The character of the artist doesn't enter into the nature of the art
I paint people, not because of what they are like, not exactly in spite of what they are like, but how they happen to be.
I could never put anything into a picture that wasn't actually there in front of me. That would be a pointless lie, a mere bit of artfulness.
If by 'intellectual' you mean people who are a special class who are in the business of imposing thoughts and forming ideas for people in power, and telling people what they should believe...they're really more a kind of secular priesthood, whose task it is to uphold the doctrinal truths of the society. And the population SHOULD be anti-intellectual in that repect.
Mob rule is always extremely dangerous for the future of democracy.
Everyone has a responsibility to not only tolerate another person's point of view, but also to accept it eagerly as a challenge to your own understanding. And express those challenges in terms of serving other people.
The more completely we give of ourselves, the more completely the world gives back to us.
We have to keep asking ourselves: 'What does it all mean? What is God trying to tell us? How are we called to live in the midst of all this?' Without such questions our lives become numb and flat.
The courts of kings are full of people, but empty of friends.
Subscribe for the occasional hand-picked quote. No noise.