Envy, propelled by fear, can be even more toxic than anger, because it involves the thought that other people enjoy the good things of life which the envier can't hope to attain through hard work and emulation.
Martha NussbaumRead
Mob rule is always extremely dangerous for the future of democracy.
Interpretation
Mob rule threatens democratic values and can lead to chaos.
Martha Nussbaum's quote emphasizes the perilous nature of mob rule, arguing that when decisions are made by the masses rather than through thoughtful deliberation and democratic processes, it endangers the fundamental principles of democracy. In essence, she warns that collective emotional outbursts can undermine justice and rational governance, leading to a future where democracy is at risk.
In practice
In a political debate, one might reference Nussbaum's quote to discuss the importance of maintaining rational debate.
Envy, propelled by fear, can be even more toxic than anger, because it involves the thought that other people enjoy the good things of life which the envier can't hope to attain through hard work and emulation.
This is true across every single society; we project grossness onto a racial or gender subgroup or caste. A big part of social subordination and discrimination is to ascribe hyper-animality to other groups and use that as an excuse for subordinating them further.
Often, we feel helpless in lots of situations in our lives. The way anger gets a grip on us is it seems to be a way to extricate ourselves from helplessness.
Courses in the humanities, in particular, often seem impractical, but they are vital, because they stretch your imagination and challenge your mind to become more responsive, more critical, bigger.
I find so often, you know, just on a very mundane level; you've got a meeting and your child's acting in a school play. You can't do both things. And it's not simply that you can't do both, but whatever you do, you're going to be neglecting something that's really important.
Look at the great tradition of Western political philosophy. Those people were all immersed in revolutionary movements. Most weren't career academics - often, they were too radical to be accepted in the academy. Rousseau's books were banned. Jeremy Bentham and John Stuart Mill couldn't hold academic positions because they were atheists.
Ideas, in a free society, are not a crime- and neither can they serve as the justification of a crime.
The word 'tolerance' once meant we all have the right to argue rationally for our deepest convictions in the public arena. Now it means those convictions are not even subject to rational debate.
All wars are follies, very expensive and very mischievous ones. In my opinion, there never was a good war or a bad peace. When will mankind be convinced and agree to settle their difficulties by arbitration?
When I grew up in the South, I was taught that segregation was the will of God, and the Bible was quoted to prove it. I was taught that women were by nature in inferior to men, and the Bible was quoted to prove it. I was taught that it was okay to hate other religions, and especially the Jews, and the Bible was quoted to prove it.
They tell him that there is no why, since the moment simply is and since all of them are trapped in the moment, like bugs in amber.
It was the contemplation of God that created men who were equal, for it was in God that they were equal.
Subscribe for the occasional hand-picked quote. No noise.