The history of thought, of knowledge, of philosophy, of literature seems to be seeking, and discovering, more and more discontinuities, whereas history itself appears to be abandoning the irruption of events in favor of stable structures.
Interpretation
The quote suggests that while knowledge evolves through ideas and literature, actual historical events tend to stabilize into structures.
Michel Foucault's quote reflects on the contrast between the dynamic nature of thought and knowledge, which continuously seeks new insights and recognizes discontinuities, versus the more stable and structured narrative of history itself. He suggests that while intellectual pursuit is marked by the quest for change and novelty, history tends to favor continuity and established frameworks, leading to a tension between the two realms.
In practice
In a lecture about the nature of historical narratives.
A real subjection is born mechanically from a fictitious relation [...] He who is subjected to a field of visibility, and who knows it, assumes responsibility for the constraints of power; he makes them play spontaneously upon himself; he inscribed in himself the power relation in which he simultaneously plays both roles; he becomes the principle of his own subjection.
Matthey, a Geneva physician very close to Rousseau's influence, formulates the prospect for all men of reason: 'Do not glory in your state, if you are wise and civilized men; an instant suffices to disturb and annihilate that supposed wisdom of which you are so proud; an unexpected event, a sharp and sudden emotion of the soul will abruptly change the most reasonable and intelligent man into a raving idiot.
But the guilty person is only one of the targets of punishment. For punishment is directed above all at others, at all the potentially guilty.
I don’t feel that it is necessary to know exactly what I am. The main interest in life and work is to become someone else that you were not in the beginning. If you knew when you began a book what you would say at the end, do you think that you would have the courage to write it? What is true for writing and for love relationships is true also for life. The game is worthwhile insofar as we don’t know what will be the end.
You may have killed God beneath the weight of all that you have said; but don't imagine that, with all that you are saying, you will make a man that will live longer than he.
The work of an intellectual is not to mould the political will of others; it is, through the analyses that he does in his own field, to re-examine evidence and assumptions, to shake up habitual ways of working and thinking, to dissipate conventional familiarities, to re-evaluate rules and institutions and to participate in the formation of a political will (where he has his role as citizen to play).
To be sure, those who are actually engaged in combat - those who actually see the maimed bodies and mourning mothers - struggle more than the rest of us to make sense of the reality of war.
There is a wonderful ancient Sufi saying which I'm going to paraphrase slightly. It says, 'When the heart weeps for what it has lost,' in this case 'heart' means 'ego,' 'when the heart weeps for what it has lost, the spirit rejoices for what it has found.'
The dialectic cannot stop short before the conceptsof health and sickness, nor indeed before their siblings reason and unreason.
Live in the present moment. The past and future are nonexistent. Only the present can be grasped or, better, embraced.
He wears a mask, and his face grows to fit it.
Religion was instituted to make us happy in this life and in the other. What must we do to be happy in the life to come? Be just.
Subscribe for the occasional hand-picked quote. No noise.