The idea that human kind can shape the world according to wish is what I call the fatal conceit
Interpretation
Humanity's belief in its ability to control and shape the world can lead to misguided decisions.
In this quote, Friedrich August Von Hayek expresses skepticism about the notion that humans can fully control or engineer society and the world according to their desires. He refers to this belief as 'the fatal conceit,' suggesting that such an arrogant assumption can lead to negative consequences and unanticipated outcomes, as it underestimates the complexity of social and economic systems that are far beyond any individual's or group's capacity to manipulate directly.
In practice
This quote can be used in a discussion about economic policies that attempt to centrally plan outcomes.
What our generation has forgotten is that the system of private property is the most important guarantee of freedom, not only for those who own property, but scarcely less for those who do not. It is only because the control of the means of production is divided among many people acting independently that nobody has complete power over us, that we as individuals can decide what to do with ourselves.
The curious task of economics is to demonstrate to men how little they really know about what they imagine they can design.
It is only because the majority opinion will always be opposed by some that our knowledge and understanding progress... it is always from a minority acting in ways different from what the majority would prescribe that the majority in the end learns to do better.
Fascism is the stage reached after communism has proved an illusion.
It is because freedom means the renunciation of direct control of individual efforts that a free society can make use of so much more knowledge than the mind of the wisest ruler could comprehend.
The importance of our being free to do a particular thing has nothing to do with the question of whether we or the majority are ever likely to make use of that particular possibility. To grant no more freedom than all can exercise would be to misconceive its function completely. The freedom that will be used by only one man in a million may be more important to society and more beneficial to the majority than any freedom that we all use.
Death is no more than passing from one room into another. But there's a difference for me, you know. Because in that other room I shall be able to see.
Every State has a natural right in cases not within the compact (casus non faederis) to nullify of their own authority all assumptions of power by others within their limits. Without this right, they would be under the dominion, absolute and unlimited, of whosoever might exercise this right of judgment for them.
She could never be a saint, but she thought she could be a martyr if they killed her quick.
It has had a calamitous effect on converted peoples. To be converted you have to destroy your past, destroy your history. You have to stamp on it, you have to say 'my ancestral culture does not exist, it doesn't matter'.
It is often argued that religion is valuable because it makes men good, but even if this were true it would not be a proof that religion is true. That would be an extension of pragmatism beyond endurance. Santa Claus makes children good in precisely the same way, and yet no one would argue seriously that the fact proves his existence. The defense of religion is full of such logical imbecilities.
No pen can give an adequate description of the all-pervading corruption produced by slavery.
Subscribe for the occasional hand-picked quote. No noise.