A great power imposes the obligation of exercising restraint, and we did not live up to this obligation. I think this affected many of the scientists in a subtle sense, and it diminished their desire to continue to work on the bomb.
Leo SzilardRead
Those individuals who give moral considerations a much greater weight than considerations of expediency represent a comparatively small minority, five percent of the people perhaps. But, In spite of their numerical inferiority, they play a major role in our society because theirs is the voice of the conscience of society.
Interpretation
The quote emphasizes the importance of moral integrity over practical benefits, highlighting the impact of a small group of principled individuals.
In this quote, Leo Szilard acknowledges that while only a small percentage of people prioritize moral considerations over expediency, their influence on society is significant. These individuals, who act based on ethical standards rather than just practicality, embody the conscience of the community, shaping values and guiding actions that uphold integrity and a sense of justice.
In practice
An activist might share this quote during a speech about ethical behavior in leadership.
A great power imposes the obligation of exercising restraint, and we did not live up to this obligation. I think this affected many of the scientists in a subtle sense, and it diminished their desire to continue to work on the bomb.
I have been asked whether I would agree that the tragedy of the scientist is that he is able to bring about great advances in our knowledge, which mankind may then proceed to use for purposes of destruction. My answer is that this is not the tragedy of the scientist; it is the tragedy of mankind.
A scientist's aim in a discussion with his colleagues is not to persuade, but to clarify.
Even if we accept, as the basic tenet of true democracy, that one moron is equal to one genius, is it necessary to go a further step and hold that two morons are better than one genius?
If one knows only what one is told, one does not know enough to be able to arrive at a well-balanced decision.
We have thought of peace as the passive and war as the active way of living. The opposite is true. War is not the most strenuous life. It is a kind of rest-cure compared to the task of reconciling our differences.
The glory of God is a human being fully alive; and to be alive consists in beholding God.
Perfection of character is this: to live each day as if it were your last, without frenzy, without apathy, without pretence.
I really believe that all of us, as Americans... we all need to be treated like fellow human beings.
This is the nature of war, whose stake is at once the game and the authority and the justification. Seen so, war is the truest form of divination. It is the testing of one's will and the will of another within that larger will which because it binds them is therefore forced to select. War is the ultimate game because war is at last a forcing of the unity of existence.War is god.
I just miss - I miss being anonymous.
Subscribe for the occasional hand-picked quote. No noise.