A great power imposes the obligation of exercising restraint, and we did not live up to this obligation. I think this affected many of the scientists in a subtle sense, and it diminished their desire to continue to work on the bomb.
Leo SzilardRead
Even if we accept, as the basic tenet of true democracy, that one moron is equal to one genius, is it necessary to go a further step and hold that two morons are better than one genius?
Interpretation
This quote critiques the idea of democracy by questioning the equality of intelligence in decision-making.
Leo Szilard's quote highlights a potential flaw in democratic systems where the principle of equal voting rights can lead to the dominance of uninformed or less intelligent opinions over more knowledgeable ones. By suggesting that the opinions of two less informed individuals might outweigh that of a single genius, he raises concerns about whether a true democracy can function effectively when the majority may lack necessary understanding.
In practice
This quote can be used in a political debate to discuss the limits of democracy.
A great power imposes the obligation of exercising restraint, and we did not live up to this obligation. I think this affected many of the scientists in a subtle sense, and it diminished their desire to continue to work on the bomb.
I have been asked whether I would agree that the tragedy of the scientist is that he is able to bring about great advances in our knowledge, which mankind may then proceed to use for purposes of destruction. My answer is that this is not the tragedy of the scientist; it is the tragedy of mankind.
A scientist's aim in a discussion with his colleagues is not to persuade, but to clarify.
Those individuals who give moral considerations a much greater weight than considerations of expediency represent a comparatively small minority, five percent of the people perhaps. But, In spite of their numerical inferiority, they play a major role in our society because theirs is the voice of the conscience of society.
If one knows only what one is told, one does not know enough to be able to arrive at a well-balanced decision.
For nature by the same cause, provided it remain in the same condition, always produces the same effect, so that either coming-to-be or passing-away will always result.
Security is when everything is settled, when nothing can happen to you; security is the denial of life.
He did not like the grown-ups who talked down to him, but the ones who went on talking in their usual way, leaving him to leap along in their wake, jumping at meanings, guessing, clutching at known words, and chuckling at complicated jokes as they suddenly dawned. He had the glee of the porpoise then, pouring and leaping through strange seas.
The basic test of freedom is perhaps less in what we are free to do than in what we are free not to do.
To consider this desirable would be to delight in the slaughter of men; and he who delights in the slaughter of men cannot get his will in the kingdom.
Clay is fashioned into vessels; it is on their empty hollowness that their use depends. Doors and windows are cut out to make a dwelling, and on the empty space within, its use depends. Thus, while the existence of things may be good, it is the non-existence in them that makes them serviceable.
Subscribe for the occasional hand-picked quote. No noise.