A great power imposes the obligation of exercising restraint, and we did not live up to this obligation. I think this affected many of the scientists in a subtle sense, and it diminished their desire to continue to work on the bomb.
Leo SzilardRead
Even if we accept, as the basic tenet of true democracy, that one moron is equal to one genius, is it necessary to go a further step and hold that two morons are better than one genius?
Interpretation
This quote critiques the idea of democracy by questioning the equality of intelligence in decision-making.
Leo Szilard's quote highlights a potential flaw in democratic systems where the principle of equal voting rights can lead to the dominance of uninformed or less intelligent opinions over more knowledgeable ones. By suggesting that the opinions of two less informed individuals might outweigh that of a single genius, he raises concerns about whether a true democracy can function effectively when the majority may lack necessary understanding.
In practice
This quote can be used in a political debate to discuss the limits of democracy.
A great power imposes the obligation of exercising restraint, and we did not live up to this obligation. I think this affected many of the scientists in a subtle sense, and it diminished their desire to continue to work on the bomb.
I have been asked whether I would agree that the tragedy of the scientist is that he is able to bring about great advances in our knowledge, which mankind may then proceed to use for purposes of destruction. My answer is that this is not the tragedy of the scientist; it is the tragedy of mankind.
A scientist's aim in a discussion with his colleagues is not to persuade, but to clarify.
Those individuals who give moral considerations a much greater weight than considerations of expediency represent a comparatively small minority, five percent of the people perhaps. But, In spite of their numerical inferiority, they play a major role in our society because theirs is the voice of the conscience of society.
If one knows only what one is told, one does not know enough to be able to arrive at a well-balanced decision.
We come from a dark abyss, we end in a dark abyss, and we call the luminous interval life.
Sadness gives depth. Happiness gives height. Sadness gives roots. Happiness gives branches. Happiness is like a tree going into the sky, and sadness is like the roots going down into the womb of the earth. Both are needed, and the higher a tree goes, the deeper it goes, simultaneously. The bigger the tree, the bigger will be its roots. In fact, it is always in proportion. That's its balance.
I don't necessarily agree with everything I say.
To be a man, to have been born without knowing it or wanting it, to be thrown into the ocean of existence, to be obliged to swim, to exist; to have an identity; to resist the pressure and shocks from the outside and the unforeseen and unforeseeable acts - one's own and those of others - which so often exceed one's capacities? And what is more, to endure one's own thoughts about all this: in a word, to be human.
Our humble service attitude in our life is what determines what effect chanting will have on our consciousness. Otherwise we can be chanting for millions and millions of births before we actually achieve the goal.
We are all living in cages with the door wide open.
Subscribe for the occasional hand-picked quote. No noise.