A great power imposes the obligation of exercising restraint, and we did not live up to this obligation. I think this affected many of the scientists in a subtle sense, and it diminished their desire to continue to work on the bomb.
Leo SzilardRead
Even if we accept, as the basic tenet of true democracy, that one moron is equal to one genius, is it necessary to go a further step and hold that two morons are better than one genius?
Interpretation
This quote critiques the idea of democracy by questioning the equality of intelligence in decision-making.
Leo Szilard's quote highlights a potential flaw in democratic systems where the principle of equal voting rights can lead to the dominance of uninformed or less intelligent opinions over more knowledgeable ones. By suggesting that the opinions of two less informed individuals might outweigh that of a single genius, he raises concerns about whether a true democracy can function effectively when the majority may lack necessary understanding.
In practice
This quote can be used in a political debate to discuss the limits of democracy.
A great power imposes the obligation of exercising restraint, and we did not live up to this obligation. I think this affected many of the scientists in a subtle sense, and it diminished their desire to continue to work on the bomb.
I have been asked whether I would agree that the tragedy of the scientist is that he is able to bring about great advances in our knowledge, which mankind may then proceed to use for purposes of destruction. My answer is that this is not the tragedy of the scientist; it is the tragedy of mankind.
A scientist's aim in a discussion with his colleagues is not to persuade, but to clarify.
Those individuals who give moral considerations a much greater weight than considerations of expediency represent a comparatively small minority, five percent of the people perhaps. But, In spite of their numerical inferiority, they play a major role in our society because theirs is the voice of the conscience of society.
If one knows only what one is told, one does not know enough to be able to arrive at a well-balanced decision.
In our hyper-secular world, worship is still inevitable. But it is vital to remember that our gods don't choose us, we choose them.
How shall a man escape from that which is written; How shall he flee from his destiny?
Being Irish, he had an abiding sense of tragedy, which sustained him through temporary periods of joy.
Because of lack of moral principle, human life becomes worthless. Moral principle, truthfulness, is a key factor. If we lose that, then there is no future.
Experience has shown, and a true philosophy will always show, that a vast, perhaps the larger portion of the truth arises from the seemingly irrelevant.
Conservatism leads nowhere; it satisfies no ideal.
Subscribe for the occasional hand-picked quote. No noise.