I don't think there will ever be a permanent truce, but I believe the media needs to be more careful and be willing to count to 10 before rushing on the air or into print.
If information is true, if it can be verified, and if it's really important, the newspaper needs to be willing to take the risk associated with using unidentified sources.
Interpretation
What this quote means
This quote emphasizes the responsibility of newspapers to prioritize truth and significance, even when sourcing information is risky.
Bob Woodward highlights the crucial role of newspapers in reporting information that is not only true and verifiable but also significant to the public. He argues that even when there are risks involved, particularly with unidentified sources, the pursuit of important truths should guide journalistic practices. This reflects a commitment to ethical journalism where the welfare of society takes precedence over potential challenges.
Themes
In practice
Example use cases
During a panel discussion on press ethics, this quote could be used to emphasize the necessity of reporting the truth.
More from Bob Woodward
All quotes βThere's hostility to lying, and there should be.
Newspapers that are truly independent, like The Washington Post, can still aggressively investigate anyone or anything with no holds barred.
The legislator learns that when you talk a lot, you get in trouble. You have to listen a lot to make deals.
The central dilemma in journalism is that you don't know what you don't know.
I'm not going to name some of my colleagues who are very well-known for their television presentation, but they wouldn't know new information or how to report a story if it came up and bit them.
Similar quotes
If youre a reporter, the easiest thing in the world is to get a story. The hardest thing is to verify. The old sins were about getting something wrong, that was a cardinal sin. The new sin is to be boring.
Purchasing a story in order to bury it is a practice that many in the tabloid industry call 'catch and kill.'
Give news a little more time, and don't request that they also, in their news time, entertain. We're not entertainers. We're journalists. And we need more time to do our job well.
Helping set the day's agenda and deciding what we used and editing it, that was a journalistic high point. I liked reporting as well. Just doing the news - the live performance - wasn't important. Working on the desk was.
We have to compete in a universe of 200 networks, so we have to carve out our own niche, and to me, that niche is just basic shoe-leather journalism with some good journalists at the helm you can trust as presenters.
As I occasionally survey the pack of sycophantic shih tzus in the Washington press corps, wriggling on their bellies to kiss the feet of those in power, I feel plumb discouraged about the future of journalism.