I don't think there will ever be a permanent truce, but I believe the media needs to be more careful and be willing to count to 10 before rushing on the air or into print.
If information is true, if it can be verified, and if it's really important, the newspaper needs to be willing to take the risk associated with using unidentified sources.
Interpretation
What this quote means
This quote emphasizes the responsibility of newspapers to prioritize truth and significance, even when sourcing information is risky.
Bob Woodward highlights the crucial role of newspapers in reporting information that is not only true and verifiable but also significant to the public. He argues that even when there are risks involved, particularly with unidentified sources, the pursuit of important truths should guide journalistic practices. This reflects a commitment to ethical journalism where the welfare of society takes precedence over potential challenges.
Themes
In practice
Example use cases
During a panel discussion on press ethics, this quote could be used to emphasize the necessity of reporting the truth.
More from Bob Woodward
All quotes βThere's hostility to lying, and there should be.
Newspapers that are truly independent, like The Washington Post, can still aggressively investigate anyone or anything with no holds barred.
The legislator learns that when you talk a lot, you get in trouble. You have to listen a lot to make deals.
The central dilemma in journalism is that you don't know what you don't know.
I'm not going to name some of my colleagues who are very well-known for their television presentation, but they wouldn't know new information or how to report a story if it came up and bit them.
Similar quotes
I take a certain pride in having maintained a reputation for fast copy throughout my newspaper career. Fast-breaking stories left my typewriter in a hurry. Not great literature, perhaps, but fast, and usually accurate.
The great concern is that year after year, rising numbers of journalists are being killed in pursuit of their work. They are increasingly seen as not being neutral but rather as combatants by one side or the other.
We cannot make good news out of bad practice.
My inclination, as an old-school, classically trained journalist, is not to go with a story unless I have it hard. It's not good enough to say something based on rumors that were flying around.
The biggest problem I have in journalism is being quoted or misquoted and then being asked to defend something I haven't said.
I feel no compulsion to be a pundit. As a matter of fact, I really don't have that much to say about most things. Working with hard news satisfies me completely.