I protest against the use of infinite magnitude ..., which is never permissible in mathematics.
This investigation has yielded an unanticipated result that reaction of cyanic acid with ammonia gives urea, a noteworthy result in as much as it provides an example of the artificial production of an organic, indeed a so-called animal, substance from inorganic substances.
Interpretation
What this quote means
The quote emphasizes the significance of synthesizing organic compounds from inorganic materials, marking a milestone in chemistry.
Friedrich Wohler's statement reflects a groundbreaking moment in the field of chemistry, where he discovered that cyanic acid can react with ammonia to produce urea. This result is particularly noteworthy because it demonstrates that organic compounds, typically associated with living organisms, can be artificially created from inorganic substances, challenging the previous belief that organic compounds could only originate from biological sources.
Themes
In practice
Example use cases
In a lecture about the history of chemistry, this quote can demonstrate the evolution of scientific understanding.
Similar quotes
On two occasions I have been asked, 'Pray, Mr. Babbage, if you put into the machine wrong figures, will the right answers come out?' I am not able rightly to apprehend the kind of confusion of ideas that could provoke such a question.
A full understanding of what happens in our everyday lives needs to take into account what happened at the Big Bang. And not only is that intrinsically interesting and just kind of cool to think about, but it's also a mystery that is not given much attention by working scientists; it's a little bit underappreciated.
When, as we must often do, we fear science, we really fear ourselves.
While I thought myself employed only in forming a nomenclature, and while I proposed to myself nothing more than to improve the chemical language, my work transformed itself by degrees, without my being able to prevent it, into a treatise upon the Elements of Chemistry.
The atom can't be seen, yet its existence can be proved. And it is simple to prove that it can't ever be seen. It has to be studied by indirect evidence - and the technical difficulty has been compared to asking a man who has never seen a piano to describe a piano from the sound it would make falling downstairs in the dark.