What is interesting is that, although it is framed as a war between the elites and Main Street, the Tea Party is actually really good for the elites.
Chrystia FreelandRead
The irony of the political rise of the plutocrats is that, like Venice's oligarchs, they threaten the system that created them.
Interpretation
The wealthy elite may undermine the very system that allowed them to gain power.
In this quote, Chrystia Freeland highlights the paradox that the political elevation of the wealthy can lead to a destabilization of the societal structures that facilitated their success. Similar to the oligarchs of Venice, those who rise to power through capital accumulation may inadvertently jeopardize the frameworks that support their influence, raising questions about sustainability and the future of democracy.
In practice
In a political debate about campaign financing, this quote could illustrate how wealthy donors may harm democracy.
What is interesting is that, although it is framed as a war between the elites and Main Street, the Tea Party is actually really good for the elites.
All of us can agree that we want government to work as well as possible, and we should all applaud efforts to improve it. But there is no escaping the divisive and essential questions: What is the purpose of the state, and whom does it serve?
In a globalized economy, jobs no longer need a passport, but workers do.
This is the 21st-century paradox: Even as political democracy has become the intellectual default mode for much of the world, the private sector usually trumps the public one when it comes to accommodating consumer choice.
Living as we do in the age of Facebook, we shouldn't be surprised that some countries are starting to imagine themselves more as social networks than as a physical place.
One of the most important political and economic facts of this young century is that capital has been slipping the traces of the nation-state. Business is global; government is national.
I don't think that people are disinterested or uninterested in politics. I think very often they are disengaged from the formal political process. To some extent they are suspicious or even despairing of formal politics as a means to give expression and effect to what they want.
American politics used to be an amateur sport. But somewhere along the way, we handed over to professionals all the things people used to do for free.
The countries of Europe are too small to guarantee their peoples the necessary prosperity and social development. The European states must constitute themselves into a federation.
Democracy relies on free speech. Yes, say anything you want, but it relies even more on the speech being truthful. It is the truth, after all, that sets us free.
If the people fail to vote, a government will be developed which is not their government... The whole system of American Government rests on the ballot box. Unless citizens perform their duties there, such a system of government is doomed to failure.
Vote for the man who promises least; he'll be the least disappointing.
Subscribe for the occasional hand-picked quote. No noise.