If there were Israeli attacks on Iranian nuclear facilities, it makes it certain there would be a reprisal attack against the United States at some point.
Interpretation
The quote suggests that if Israel strikes Iran's nuclear sites, the U.S. will inevitably face retaliation.
Salman Rushdie's quote highlights the geopolitical ramifications of military actions, emphasizing that an Israeli attack on Iranian nuclear facilities could trigger a backlash directed at the United States. This reflects the interconnectedness of global politics where conflicts can escalate and affect various nations, illustrating the potential consequences of unilateral military actions in a volatile region.
In practice
In a discussion on Middle Eastern politics, one might say, 'As Salman Rushdie warned, if there are Israeli attacks on Iranian facilities, the U.S. could be targeted next.'
I've been fascinated by Machiavelli since I was very young. I've always felt that he had a bad rap from history, and that he was actually a person quite unlike what we now think of as Machiavellian. He was a republican. He disliked totalitarian government.
Killing people because you don't like their ideas - it's a bad thing.
faith without doubt is addiction
I am clearly vulnerable to these more passionate and volatile unstable relationships. I am trying to not be so vulnerable.
In India, as elsewhere in our darkening world, religion is the poison in the blood. Where religion intervenes, mere innocence is no excuse. Yet we go on skating around this issue, speaking of religion in the fashionable language of 'respect.' What is there to respect in any of this, or in any of the crimes now being committed almost daily around the world in religion's dreaded name?
Reality is a question of perspective; the further you get from the past, the more concrete and plausible it seems - but as you approach the present, it inevitably seems more and more incredible.
Of course the Republicans have long wanted to privatize Social Security and destroy it. But Social Security has been the most important and valuable social program in the history of the United States.
When it comes to terrorism, governments seem to suffer from a collective amnesia. All of our historical experience tells us that there can be no purely military solution to a political problem, and yet every time we confront a new terrorist group, we begin by insisting we will never talk to them.
If you had to work in the environment of Washington, D.C., as I do, and watch those men who are so imprisoned and so confined by their eighteenth-century thought patterns, you would know that if anybody is going to be liberated, it's men who must be liberated in this country.
When you start talking about elections being rigged, you're pushing people beyond democratic governance. And it's a very, very dangerous thing to do.
An invisible empire has been set up above the forms of Democracy
While democracy in the long run is the most stable form of government, in the short run, it is among the most fragile.
Subscribe for the occasional hand-picked quote. No noise.