I am nothing but I must be everything.
Karl MarxRead
And as for the Jews, who since the emancipation of their sect have everywhere put themselves, at least in the person of their eminent representatives, at the head of the counter-revolution -- what awaits them?
Interpretation
Marx critiques the role of Jews in counter-revolutionary movements post-emancipation.
In this quote, Karl Marx reflects on the position of Jews in society after their emancipation, suggesting that they have taken leadership roles in counter-revolutionary efforts. This observation raises questions about the complex interplay between social identity, power dynamics, and political movements, particularly in the context of Jewish history and the socio-political climate of Marx's time.
In practice
In a discussion on radical political movements, one might cite Marx's observation about Jewish leadership in counter-revolution.
I am nothing but I must be everything.
Religion is the opiate of the people.
It is absolutely impossible to transcend the laws of nature. What can change in historically different circumstances is only the form in which these laws expose themselves.
Men make their own history, but they do not make it just as they please; they do not make it under circumstances chosen by themselves, but under circumstances directly encountered, given and transmitted from the past. The tradition of all the dead generations weighs like a nightmare on the brain of the living.
To be radical is to grasp things by the root.
Men's ideas are the most direct emanations of their material state.
I am sometimes shocked by the blasphemies of those who think themselves pious.
I build no system. I ask an end to privilege, the abolition of slavery, equality of rights, and the reign of law. Justice, nothing else; that is the alpha and omega of my argument: to others I leave the business of governing the world.
I soon began to sense a fundamental perceptual difficulty among male scholars (and some female ones) for which 'sexism' is too facile a term. It is really an intellectual defect, which might be termed 'patrivincialism' or patrochialism': the assumption that women are a subgroup, that men's culture is the 'real' world, that patriarchy is equivalent to culture and culture to patriarchy, that the 'great' or 'liberalizing' periods of history have been the same for women as for men.
Greatness and goodness are not means, but ends! Hath he not always treasures, always friends, The good great man? Three treasures, love and light, And calm thoughts, regular as infants' breath; And three firm friends, more sure than day and night, Himself, his Maker, and the angel Death.
It's the people who don't recognize the racism within themselves that can be the most damaging because they don't see it.
My political curiosity, exclusive of my anxious solicitude for the public welfare, leads me to ask who authorized them (the framers of the Constitution) to speak the language of 'We, the People,' instead of 'We, the States'?
Subscribe for the occasional hand-picked quote. No noise.