The law of the Creator, which invests every human being with an inalienable title to freedom, cannot be repealed by any interior law which asserts that man is property.
Interpretation
This quote emphasizes the inherent right to freedom that every person possesses, despite any laws or systems that may deem otherwise.
Salmon P. Chase's quote articulates a profound belief in the fundamental nature of human freedom, arguing that this right is innate and cannot be overridden by unjust laws that treat individuals as property. It serves as a reminder that true freedom is a birthright, granted by the Creator, and no human-made law can morally invalidate this essence of humanity. This perspective is a powerful assertion against slavery and oppression, emphasizing the inviolability of personal liberty.
In practice
In a speech advocating for civil rights, one could use this quote to highlight the injustice of discriminatory laws.
My agency in promoting the passage of the National Bank Act was the greatest financial mistake of my life. It has built up a monopoly, which affects every interest in the country. It should be repealed, but before that can be accomplished, the people will be arrayed on one side and the banks on the other, in a contest such as we have never before seen in this country.
And upon this act, sincerely believed to be an act of justice, warranted by the Constitution, upon military necessity, I invoke the considerate judgment of all mankind, and the gracious favor of Almighty God.
Once I should have been, if not satisfied, partially, at least, contented with suffrage for the intelligent and those who have been soldiers; now I am convinced that universal suffrage is demanded by sound policy and impartial justice.
Evil people naturally assume that you will use that power exactly as they would use it.
Oh that I could have the cross painted on my eyeballs, that I could not see anything except through the medium of my Saviorβs passion!
Time present and time past / are both perhaps present in time future.
β¦ and so he tried to accept the ache in his heart as what Dr. Larch would call the common symptoms of normal life.
Stereotypes should never influence policy or public opinion.
Are we at last brought to such humiliating and debasing degradation that we cannot be trusted with arms for our defense? Where is the difference between having our arms in possession and under our direction, and having them under the management of Congress? If our defense be the real object of having those arms, in whose hands can they be trusted with more propriety, or equal safety to us, as in our own hands?
Subscribe for the occasional hand-picked quote. No noise.